The purpose of American weapons (laughably few of them) is to kill Russians, not to "murder" them. What the fuck, again?
Not sure how $40 billion, which is close to the military budget of the Ruskies, is 'laughably little', but alright. And Russian sources claim that they have found NATO munitions shot at civilian areas.
Wish they really had your "munitions supposed by NATO".
Sincere question: why? What is that shithole of a country to you, or to me?
Btw, the Taliban just officially thanked Russia for all the (secret) help they have been receiving for 2 decades of fighting against America and allies. That's in their own words. Americans have been talking it for years (including about Russia's Iran Conta drugs for weapons scheme), now it's not a secret anymore.
Can you link the statement? I remember the 'Russian bounties' story, which was of course complete bunk.
Regardless, you keep forgetting that my argument is not "Russia good". It's that the West is at least as bad as they claim Russia is.
The final decision to attack (which the Americans announced they know about in a desperate move, and people here laughed about it) was made long in advance. It was then only delayed from Feb 16 to 24.
Then why be so poorly prepared (if those claims are correct, which seems likely to me)? It makes more sense that it was done as a feint, as a bargaining chip, but when Putin realized that the West was absolutely immovable and wouldn't make the slightest concessions - he ordered the invasion.
It seems to me that the Americans were the only ones who wanted and want this war (along with their European puppets), which is why they are so jingoistic about it.
giving a lot of them WWII bolt action rifles because cannon fodder, not like Russia doesn't have mountains of spare AKs they don't use anymore
How does that make sense? These are the people Putin hopes to rule. There is not much to rule if people are dead and the rest hate you for sending people to their deaths.
Also, if Russia did send them AKs, the Western countries would cry about 'Russian weapon deliveries'.
and evacuated civilians (then brought them back after the attack began).
Dead civilians have very good propaganda value, which would explain this as well as the behavior of Hamas and Ukraine.
If you want peace, do not try to shift the balance of power. Because if Ukraine is getting stronger and Russia is getting weaker, as was the case, that makes war inevitable - as you well know due to the World War I precedent.
One American weapons are very expensive, two only a faction of this goes into military aid.
What is it to me: they fight Russia there so we (and the Baltics, and the Moldovans, and the Georgians again,and others) don't have to fight Russia HERE. But time can come we might have to fight here. An actual World War III, alright. Don't cry about nuclear war then.
Btw this "shithole" is the largest European country. Even used to be the #3 global nuclear superpower, more so than China, for a short while.
You learnt the word "feint" from the desperate rationalisation of Russian defeat ob the northern front, don't you. I know you did
We aren't anyone's puppets. We used to be Moscow'a, 1944-1989. Never again.
Americans openly said they are making this public as to avoid the attack. While Ukraine didn't cooperate and kept making stupid statements to the contrary, and then the sudden rush to make (useless) Molotov cocktails and other last ditch idiocy. Pain
The Taliboys judt visited Moscow, look it up.
They have given them fucking trainload of tanks and artillery, and the airliner-downing Buks, and everything in the past. But that went to the volunteers fighting instead of Russian regulars (well to the "vacationing" regulars too), and not the drafted cannon fodder. About which Strelkov recently said they suffered 70% casualties in infantry on the Kherson front.
It's kinda funny how much doomposting Strelkov is constantly. He may end up purged after all.
What and how "jingoistic nonsense"? The need to smash and burn own farms and factories and public buildings to reach out and touch the invaders hiding inside them?
Russia wasnt ,"getting weaker". Not stop military reforms and rearmament for decades, and tested all this in Syria (this is what they officiallly and publicly called it, testing new weapons, over 320 new systems, tested on humans, the ones who couldn't really fight back https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20210715-russia-tested-320-types-of-weapons-in-syria). Turns out it doesn't work that well when there's someone with the ability to shoot back, how sad
What is it to me: they fight Russia there so we (and the Baltics, and the Moldovans, and the Georgians again,and others) don't have to fight Russia HERE. But time can come we might have to fight here. An actual World War III, alright. Don't cry about nuclear war then.
Interfering with Russia in its own backyard is what creates the risk for World War III. Russia isn't coming for me, or even for you. Ukraine was a part of Russia for 200 years. No one said anything. Now it's suddenly sacred. No.
Call me when Russia actually invades a state that was not a constituent republic of the USSR.
Btw this "shithole" is the largest European country. Even used to be the #3 global nuclear superpower, more so than China, for a short while.
Just being large does not make you not a shithole.
You learnt the word "feint" from the desperate rationalisation of Russian defeat ob the northern front, don't you. I know you did
Unsure. I don't think so.
We aren't anyone's puppets. We used to be Moscow'a, 1944-1989. Never again.
You and Hungary actually fight back against the GAE. The same cannot be said of other EU member states. Doesn't the EU try to put sanctions on Hungary for preventing homosexual propaganda from being spread to children?
I fear that the American empire will prove worse than what came before. Hungarian and Polish culture survived the communists. It may not survive consumerist, managerial, American capitalism. But surprise me.
Americans openly said they are making this public as to avoid the attack.
I mean, they would look pretty bad if they admitted beforehand "we want this to happen in order to weaken Russia at the expense of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian lives".
It's kinda funny how much doomposting Strelkov is constantly. He may end up purged after all.
Wasn't he already purged?
What and how "jingoistic nonsense"? The need to smash and burn own farms and factories and public buildings to reach out and touch the invaders hiding inside them?
"Death to the invaders".
Russia wasnt ,"getting weaker".
Compare 2022 to 2014. If Russia had invaded in 2014, it would have been a cakewalk. The Banderists were getting their asses kicked by the separatists, for Pete's sake, as much as you want to cite 5 Russian soldiers as the deciding factor. If Russia had invaded in 2014, it would have been over very quickly with almost no resistance.
So yes, weaker compared to Ukraine. Ideal condition for war.
Turns out it doesn't work that well when there's someone with the ability to shoot back, how sad
Doesn't work when there's someone with unlimited support from the world's bullies, that sends weapons every few days and tries to crush your economy. And still the Russians are making progress against the proxy of the bullies.
How about that, Russia is our own backyard. Hopefully "Kaliningrad" (fuck Kalinin) can be liberated one day. Actually Germanoids can take it if they want, don't care about details.
Strelkov left in 2014 just after MH17, telling other freelancers (privateers?) it's time to leave now. He's only lost a finger (very Yakuza) while all the unruly and truly independent neo-Cossack leaders and such lost their lives. Now he keeps bitching on Telegram about what disaster is everything.
What else to invaders if not death? Flowers? Flowers can grow from them.
But Russia did invade in 2014. To save the seps at the brink of the complete Ukrainian victory (you got it completely backwards, as usual with your narratives), and force the ceasefire.
Btw one of the commanders of the Russian intervention from August 2014 was killed recently.
This "shithole" has toilets, something much of Russia doesn't.
Strelkov left in 2014 just after MH17, telling other freelancers (privateers?) it's time to leave now. He's only lost a finger (very Yakuza) while all the unruly and truly independent neo-Cossack leaders and such lost their lives.
Would Russia be smart to put him in charge of the 'special operation'?
What else to invaders if not death? Flowers? Flowers can grow from them.
I love how irrational and rageful you become when talking about Russia. You're not really looking at it objectively, but then again, Poland... love you guys, and you, but you're very wrong about this.
To save the seps at the brink of the complete Ukrainian victory (you got it completely backwards, as usual with your narratives), and force the ceasefire.
Why didn't they intervene earlier, to save Slaviansk and Severodonetsk?
This "shithole" has toilets, something much of Russia doesn't.
Did you actually fall for that narrative that Banderaland has a better standard of living than Stalinland? How come Russia has a vastly higher per capita GDP PPP?
Not sure how $40 billion, which is close to the military budget of the Ruskies, is 'laughably little', but alright. And Russian sources claim that they have found NATO munitions shot at civilian areas.
Sincere question: why? What is that shithole of a country to you, or to me?
Can you link the statement? I remember the 'Russian bounties' story, which was of course complete bunk.
Regardless, you keep forgetting that my argument is not "Russia good". It's that the West is at least as bad as they claim Russia is.
Then why be so poorly prepared (if those claims are correct, which seems likely to me)? It makes more sense that it was done as a feint, as a bargaining chip, but when Putin realized that the West was absolutely immovable and wouldn't make the slightest concessions - he ordered the invasion.
It seems to me that the Americans were the only ones who wanted and want this war (along with their European puppets), which is why they are so jingoistic about it.
How does that make sense? These are the people Putin hopes to rule. There is not much to rule if people are dead and the rest hate you for sending people to their deaths.
Also, if Russia did send them AKs, the Western countries would cry about 'Russian weapon deliveries'.
Dead civilians have very good propaganda value, which would explain this as well as the behavior of Hamas and Ukraine.
What repellent jingoistic nonsense.
If you want peace, do not try to shift the balance of power. Because if Ukraine is getting stronger and Russia is getting weaker, as was the case, that makes war inevitable - as you well know due to the World War I precedent.
Actually wrong, it was at the Rus Embassy.
https://twitter.com/SamriBackup/status/1535195176100155392
https://twitter.com/ArianaNews_/status/1535240786526228483
I mean, sounds like boilerplate to me. Certainly not $40 billion in 3 months.
One American weapons are very expensive, two only a faction of this goes into military aid.
What is it to me: they fight Russia there so we (and the Baltics, and the Moldovans, and the Georgians again,and others) don't have to fight Russia HERE. But time can come we might have to fight here. An actual World War III, alright. Don't cry about nuclear war then.
Btw this "shithole" is the largest European country. Even used to be the #3 global nuclear superpower, more so than China, for a short while.
You learnt the word "feint" from the desperate rationalisation of Russian defeat ob the northern front, don't you. I know you did
We aren't anyone's puppets. We used to be Moscow'a, 1944-1989. Never again.
Americans openly said they are making this public as to avoid the attack. While Ukraine didn't cooperate and kept making stupid statements to the contrary, and then the sudden rush to make (useless) Molotov cocktails and other last ditch idiocy. Pain
The Taliboys judt visited Moscow, look it up.
They have given them fucking trainload of tanks and artillery, and the airliner-downing Buks, and everything in the past. But that went to the volunteers fighting instead of Russian regulars (well to the "vacationing" regulars too), and not the drafted cannon fodder. About which Strelkov recently said they suffered 70% casualties in infantry on the Kherson front.
It's kinda funny how much doomposting Strelkov is constantly. He may end up purged after all.
What and how "jingoistic nonsense"? The need to smash and burn own farms and factories and public buildings to reach out and touch the invaders hiding inside them?
Russia wasnt ,"getting weaker". Not stop military reforms and rearmament for decades, and tested all this in Syria (this is what they officiallly and publicly called it, testing new weapons, over 320 new systems, tested on humans, the ones who couldn't really fight back https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20210715-russia-tested-320-types-of-weapons-in-syria). Turns out it doesn't work that well when there's someone with the ability to shoot back, how sad
Interfering with Russia in its own backyard is what creates the risk for World War III. Russia isn't coming for me, or even for you. Ukraine was a part of Russia for 200 years. No one said anything. Now it's suddenly sacred. No.
Call me when Russia actually invades a state that was not a constituent republic of the USSR.
Just being large does not make you not a shithole.
Unsure. I don't think so.
You and Hungary actually fight back against the GAE. The same cannot be said of other EU member states. Doesn't the EU try to put sanctions on Hungary for preventing homosexual propaganda from being spread to children?
I fear that the American empire will prove worse than what came before. Hungarian and Polish culture survived the communists. It may not survive consumerist, managerial, American capitalism. But surprise me.
I mean, they would look pretty bad if they admitted beforehand "we want this to happen in order to weaken Russia at the expense of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian lives".
Wasn't he already purged?
"Death to the invaders".
Compare 2022 to 2014. If Russia had invaded in 2014, it would have been a cakewalk. The Banderists were getting their asses kicked by the separatists, for Pete's sake, as much as you want to cite 5 Russian soldiers as the deciding factor. If Russia had invaded in 2014, it would have been over very quickly with almost no resistance.
So yes, weaker compared to Ukraine. Ideal condition for war.
Doesn't work when there's someone with unlimited support from the world's bullies, that sends weapons every few days and tries to crush your economy. And still the Russians are making progress against the proxy of the bullies.
How about that, Russia is our own backyard. Hopefully "Kaliningrad" (fuck Kalinin) can be liberated one day. Actually Germanoids can take it if they want, don't care about details.
Strelkov left in 2014 just after MH17, telling other freelancers (privateers?) it's time to leave now. He's only lost a finger (very Yakuza) while all the unruly and truly independent neo-Cossack leaders and such lost their lives. Now he keeps bitching on Telegram about what disaster is everything.
What else to invaders if not death? Flowers? Flowers can grow from them.
But Russia did invade in 2014. To save the seps at the brink of the complete Ukrainian victory (you got it completely backwards, as usual with your narratives), and force the ceasefire.
Btw one of the commanders of the Russian intervention from August 2014 was killed recently.
This "shithole" has toilets, something much of Russia doesn't.
Would Russia be smart to put him in charge of the 'special operation'?
I love how irrational and rageful you become when talking about Russia. You're not really looking at it objectively, but then again, Poland... love you guys, and you, but you're very wrong about this.
Why didn't they intervene earlier, to save Slaviansk and Severodonetsk?
Did you actually fall for that narrative that Banderaland has a better standard of living than Stalinland? How come Russia has a vastly higher per capita GDP PPP?