There is a possibility I made a fool out of myself: that you may actually be RealDrJester. I didn't pay attention to the style of prose being so similar down to the occasional use of bullet points. I only tagged to rib on the gatekeeping, agenda overlap, and literal cuck projection crutch.
So there I was, telling some sand dude that babies are important, and he replies "you've said nothing of value". The record scratched and I felt the need to explain how I got into this situation. Tl;dr, was baby from vagana. Maybe you can relate.
In all seriousness, maybe somewhere in the quantum realm there is a plane where it makes sense to call this "nothing of value", but I doubt it. Okay I lied, now I'm being serious: your focus on hating women is anal retentive misdirection of sexual failure (tl;dr your ass retains dick), or you are a literally a shill.
I can accept for instance, about myself, that I am eccentric. But am I laser-focused on a static agendized nuture/neg dialogue tree? You would have a hard time convincing me you are genuinely this mentally ill about women and NOTHING else. The chances of immutable topical focus on incel/mtgow over such an extended period coming from a casual, natural user are just a joke.
Speaking of quantum physics (just kidding), I've been really curious about bots lately. I think I've proven I'm not a bot, at least not one programmed to blend in the way it should. But any bot can play mad libs with a few keywords and slap ill-fitting logical fallacies onto [women(bad)+linkheading], so I'd like to ask you for an easy proof. Like if you could incorporate the phrase "and now I do this every day because I never got over her" in your reply that would seal the deal. Thanks.
I'm gonna wait till tel aviv hours putter out around 10am eastern and give you the strawman talk and your next promised compulsive insult then.
There is a possibility I made a fool out of myself: that you may actually be RealDrJester. I didn't pay attention to the style of prose being so similar down to the occasional use of bullet points. I only tagged to rib on the gatekeeping, agenda overlap, and literal cuck projection crutch.
So there I was, telling some sand dude that babies are important, and he replies "you've said nothing of value". The record scratched and I felt the need to explain how I got into this situation. Tl;dr, was baby from vagana. Maybe you can relate.
In all seriousness, maybe somewhere in the quantum realm there is a plane where it makes sense to call this "nothing of value", but I doubt it. Okay I lied, now I'm being serious: your focus on hating women is anal retentive misdirection of sexual failure (tl;dr your ass retains dick), or you are a literally a shill.
I can accept for instance, about myself, that I am eccentric. But am I laser-focused on a static agendized nuture/neg dialogue tree? You would have a hard time convincing me you are genuinely this mentally ill about women and NOTHING else. The chances of immutable topical focus on incel/mtgow over such an extended period coming from a casual, natural user are just a joke.
Speaking of quantum physics (just kidding), I've been really curious about bots lately. I think I've proven I'm not a bot, at least not one programmed to blend in the way it should. But any bot can play mad libs with a few keywords and slap ill-fitting logical fallacies onto [women(bad)+linkheading], so I'd like to ask you for an easy proof. Like if you could incorporate the phrase "and now I do this every day because I never got over her" in your reply that would seal the deal. Thanks.
Come on Imp you did that on purpose ;( use the code phrase so we can put this behind us