Actually, this makes a lot of sense...
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
no? It is missing the thickness, unless that is intended in order to underline the item in question. (Which the original work does not)
Nothing is missing I literally just retyped the text box to spell it correctly and changed nothing else. I can't make it thicker. The program I used doesn't allow for that. That's a Comic Sans font with bold, at 27 points.
Stonetoss's actual font is unique to him.
Huh, here I thought you merely went trough his work and stole the font, it is a lot of manual labor, that can be automated with image bots and some correction.
I could go through that grueling ordeal, but it's not that worth it.
This seems to be what other claim he use, and I'm checking it against some examples and it seems quite close.