TL;DR is basically in the title
As I stated in the title: they're noticing things andnd I think this may actually be an awakening for some.
I will not go so far as to call them NPCs for multiple reasons, one being that the people I am mostly talking about saw through Heard's bullshit claims and supported Depp, a male who suffered domestic abuse at the hands of a woman. Those of which are not usually listened to, or shown compassion and sometimes even mocked.
They're looking at outlets like Vanity Fair, The Atlantic, The New York Times, etc, etc (those the left usually gravitates towards) and noticing the lying these oulets are doing regarding Depp and how this trial will "silence women who experience abuse", despite evidence presented in the trial which, for those of who don't know, was televised and livestreamed so there is no question what happened, what evidence was presented, how the two parties - plaintiff and defendant - came off during, etc.
I don't want to go looking for it but you can find twitter posts from an attorney of (((Harvey Weinstein's))) actually parroting this sentiment of (paraphrased) "this finding will negatively effect female victims of domestic violence."
Ironic, isn't it?
These people - Depp's supporters - are seeing how the leftist media gaslights people, despite the evidence being clear as day.
This is a great thing, not because some of them may lean more to the right from now on, but because they are realising how corrupt and dishonest mainstream - and often legacy - media is and has become.
Quantumn Mechanics is hard.
You might need more than one book, tbh. It's a bit convoluted with higher level mathematics, though the first thing you need to understand is differential equations and vector math.
I can't tell you what the best book is, but I can tell you what basically everyone uses.
The one I learned with for my undergraduate degree, and I thought it wasn't too bad was:
However, what everyone uses as the basic guidebook of all QM for your Masters & PhD is:
If you're genuinely going to go into QM, you need that book, because it'll be your text book at some point, and you might as well get it out of the way now. That being said, I fucking HATE Shankar. He wrote this motherfucker.
Shankar is fucking indecipherable. And that "basic training" is genuinely one of the worst fucking math textbooks I've ever had. He literally explains nothing. He presents vague word problems, that don't really go into detail, asks odd questions, then there are answers. He shows almost no work. I wouldn't be surprised if he was pulling the same shit with his QM book, so don't hesitate to get a better textbook to decipher his QM book.
Read some of those fucking one star reviews:
This book expects you to already know and understand what it's trying to teach you. The author glosses over large portions of arithmetic, skipping from one formula to a vastly different one, just by saying "it's obvious" and then moving on. No reasoning, no steps on how to get there, just a chasm to leap over. It even says in the first chapter that, "If you find any portion where you seem to be weak, you must find a book on calculus [...] and remedy that defect at once."
Unless you're math knowledge is fluent and fresh (as in the past year) through DifEQ, you'll likely find this book as frustrating as the worst math teacher you've ever had - multiple and important steps skipped, use of theorems w/o explanation, vague explanations, the works. The book could have included those missing steps along with at least a brief explanation of theorems used and why, without expanding the length of the book by more than a few dozen pages. Their absence is just lazy writing. In difference to the book description, this book is not for people looking to brush up their skills. It's at best a reference or review book for people already fluent in the subjects covered.
...basically stacks of higher level theorems with proofs but with no clearly apparent purpose...the author claims that working through the book will make a student more prepared...however, at no point does he offer proof or even an explanation of how...he doesn't even offer relevance to any particular area of science...suggested alternatives are texts by Boas, Sneider, and Arfken/Weber...
If you know the math already, you don't need this book. If don't know the math, there is no way you will able to learn from this book.
The man thinks "Basic Training" means: "You already know the material and I'm just reciting it to you."
No you idiot, that's fucking wrong.
"A Fitness Program", what fucking fitness program starts with: Do a 3 mile run in 18 minutes.
God I fucking hate Shankar
The one punch man routine? joking it is not that severe.