When they say "They're trying to divide us by race", remember this.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (81)
sorted by:
Oh funny, earlier you were pretending that it was because they benefit more from expenditures from taxes.
Now you admit that it's because you plain don't like women. Is it OK for people to impose higher taxes on blacks as 'payback' for the massive rates of rape and murder among blacks?
Or is rape and murder not nearly as bad as the horrors wamen have done to you?
No, you're just nuts.
Yes, women are the pedophiles... let me guess, that's covered up by the government as well?
Why not both? They can be both detestable and unfairly privileged.
Am I though? Or am I just ahead of the curve?
I mean, the links clearly detail pedophilia arrests linked to radical feminist communities. It's naive to think your TERF friends aren't groomers like all other radical feminists. Even Simone de Beauvoir was a pedophile. Radical feminism and even basic feminism is indelibly linked with child molestation. I'd say if you investigated every feminist thoroughly, they'd absolutely dwarf everyone else in pedophilia. I also think you'd find the key to a lot of unsolved murders.
OK, so receiving more in government benefits than you pay in is being 'unfairly privileged', and having sky-high rates of rape and murder is, I assume, 'detestable'. So why do you oppose blacks having to pay more in taxes?
I'm afraid you're just nuts.
They oppose castrating and mutilating little kids. That really seems to upset you.
So women have higher rates of pedophilia and murder than men?
Because generally, you don't punish the victims of evil people. Women started BLM, women do all the race baiting. Women threw their children's fathers out for profit. Women pushed for child support settlements above 50% of the victim's earnings. Actually, writing that out makes me want to tax women even more.
If you say so. Remember me when your TERF friends run the right-wing and push feminist ideologies from both sides of the political aisle.
That's an obvious and embarrassing lie, almost Jen Psaki tier of lying. TERFs have never come out against castrating boys, they have simply stated that the castrated boys are still considered male and ergo are still subhuman. They have only ever spoken up to ensure the castrated boys are still treated like shit, to ensure they can't take the benefits of the in-group for some small comfort for the irreversible mutilation pushed on them by women.
Irreversible Damage never mentions the harm to boys, neither has the author, despite being a darling of the right because they can't see it's all just theater. TERFs are just a plant on the right, trying to make themselves look like they're important enough to be catered to, so they can force the right back down the feminist path that Trump tried to deviate from.
It's likely working, even Trump is touting a fake "war on women" that is more fake than the media's Ukrainian combat footage.
Yes but also no. They likely have a higher rate of murder against targets who are not fellow criminals, but gang violence would push the male rate higher overall.