Slightly hyperbolic title, but not by much.
When the Roe draft was leaked a couple weeks ago, most of the politicians here in NY have been engaged in mass virtue signaling about how people need more abortion, including looking to make abortions more available, and even some discussion about using tax money to pay for basically abortion tourism (come to NY, get an abortion, then go home).
Yet, earlier this week, we had this ludicrous "gem", with the NY State court of appeals hearing arguments about how Happy the Elephant
has an interest in exercising her choices and deciding who she wants to be with, and where to go, and what to do, and what to eat, and the zoo is prohibiting her from making any of those choices herself.
This is beyond Clownworld. We must allow people to murder babies however and whenever they want to, but this elephant over here needs human rights!
Man's first sin was substituting goats for retards in their "sacrifice" (leaving their sick, deformed and burdened for the predators became random killing for bloodthirsty fake "gods".)
Anyway, my original point was simply that a normal elephant outranks a human retard, so if people can demand rights for retards, then it's not outrageous to want the simplest of rights for an elephant.