Believe what part? I haven't checked out all the sources, but WPATH is a real org. It really has published guidelines for the SOC8. The guidelines do indeed refer to Eunuch Archive.
Everything they say is lies. The "unapologetically pro-woman" shows they have zero interest in identifying the actual issues.
Castration has been a trope of feminist ideas for 50 fucking years - so no, I don't believe some obscure fetish community was behind it. I believe they finally acted on their desires, in a way that makes it not immediately obvious what they're up to.
WPATH is a real org
1.1m worth doesn't give you much influence.
Contrast that to the woman led Human Rights Campaign, which takes in hundreds of millions to promote this.
This is verifiable false since the links I checked out did point to what they said. It should be pretty easy to click them and prove they are lying.
I believe they finally acted on their desires, in a way that makes it not immediately obvious what they're up to.
They acted on their desires to castrate men by sounding the alarm that castration fetishist pedo freaks have influence on the trans movement? How is that supposed to work?
Contrast that to the woman led Human Rights Campaign, which takes in hundreds of millions to promote this.
Anyone pro-woman is lying. It's not possible to be pro-woman and against transitioning children. Anyone who says they are is a liar. Being pro-woman means you reject the historical evidence that largely women advocated castrating men and the evidence in front of us that they are the majority involved in pushing this too.
Because they know the right are coming for the child transitioners - they don't want to be held accountable. This is the point where it's looking like they're going to lose the battle, so they burn the base down to stop the enemy using it.
You're proving my point here - a woman led organization is laundering their own ideas through a set scapegoat that will take the fall if they get caught.
Believe what part? I haven't checked out all the sources, but WPATH is a real org. It really has published guidelines for the SOC8. The guidelines do indeed refer to Eunuch Archive.
Anything.
Everything they say is lies. The "unapologetically pro-woman" shows they have zero interest in identifying the actual issues.
Castration has been a trope of feminist ideas for 50 fucking years - so no, I don't believe some obscure fetish community was behind it. I believe they finally acted on their desires, in a way that makes it not immediately obvious what they're up to.
1.1m worth doesn't give you much influence.
Contrast that to the woman led Human Rights Campaign, which takes in hundreds of millions to promote this.
This is verifiable false since the links I checked out did point to what they said. It should be pretty easy to click them and prove they are lying.
They acted on their desires to castrate men by sounding the alarm that castration fetishist pedo freaks have influence on the trans movement? How is that supposed to work?
Why contrast them? HRC uses WPATH as a resource.
https://www.thehrcfoundation.org/professional-resources/world-professional-association-for-transgender-health-wpath
It gets HRC and its hundreds of millions to listen to you, apparently.
Anyone pro-woman is lying. It's not possible to be pro-woman and against transitioning children. Anyone who says they are is a liar. Being pro-woman means you reject the historical evidence that largely women advocated castrating men and the evidence in front of us that they are the majority involved in pushing this too.
Because they know the right are coming for the child transitioners - they don't want to be held accountable. This is the point where it's looking like they're going to lose the battle, so they burn the base down to stop the enemy using it.
You're proving my point here - a woman led organization is laundering their own ideas through a set scapegoat that will take the fall if they get caught.