The reason this comes up is because I was reading Imp1 comments and replies to them and he’s mentioned multiple times before that he believes that the actual answer to a lot of this is making artificial wombs so that you can cut out women from making kids and relationships with women have to be about something else. That would mean that since women can't use their wombs as a bargaining tool, their intellect and personalities have to be what keeps a man interested, at least imo, and I can see why it would appeal to him, but are they even reasonable?
I haven't done the research myself and thought it would be more fun to have a discussion over it, but still, I’m just curious as to how the tech works if at all. I've seen things where the tech is being “suppressed” (hidden from the public like a lot of current tech we use today was during the Cold War, ala the internet), but is that true, or not? It's just genuinely an interesting topic to me.
Moderate and severed Dental Fluorosis ( permanent structural damage to the teeth from fluoride poisoning ) now affects ~25% of teens. It used to be rare.
Water fluoration sounds nice untill later, when the kids whose teeth formed with fluoride poisoning, have their adult teeth permanently fucked.
A clear example of why rushing experimental treatments on populations can have disastrous long-term consequences that could not have been forseen.
Yet the "experts" and politicians keep fucking with our lives.