That's literally Globalism though, at least proto-globalism. In primitive times all we cared about was tribes. As ethno-centric nations developed, the ethnic identity came to encompass larger groups, and conflicts were often on those lines. Koreans vs. Japanese, English vs. French, Everybody vs. Germans. The idea of "racial" identities only came along once we started mixing different ethnic groups together, especially in the US. White, Black, Asian. These are relatively recent constructs. Partly as a defense mechanism against globalism and forced mixing, but it also becomes a useful tool for them to categorize us into blocs and further destroy the nation-state and get people fighting the wars of the elites. (next step might be some pseudo-European identity that helps them de-person Russians) Ultimately their goal is to speed up evolution to a point where we are all just Humans living under one order. Meaningless identities are a step on that path.

It's one thing to say "I don't care bout no Chinaman" and focus on local problems. Fine, but those of us who do care aren't going to play into leftists hands and ignore them creating a fake "Asian Pacific Islander" holiday as if they aren't aware how different those sub-groups are. They know exactly what they're doing, and being ignorant only helps them.

It's also a statement about where on the oppression totem pole the Asians sit compared to Blacks and Gays who get their own months. I don't give a shit about that either, but I'm still going to call it out.