I wonder if the intent is instead simply to remove the individual states from any position of power on this.
Covid enforcement in the US was marked by a patchwork of varying levels of lockdown and mask mandates because it was decided state-by-state.
If we're screwing around and throwing international treaties at it, I'm presuming that this bypasses the states entirely and is decided at Federal level.
Ahh, that old chestnut.
How to pass a law that is not constitutional doesn't carry enough domestic support anyway?
Get it put in a treaty and sign the treaty.
Yes you are right on this but what they are doing on May 22 is apparently amending the IHR treaty that was already ratified by the Senate previously.
I wonder if the intent is instead simply to remove the individual states from any position of power on this.
Covid enforcement in the US was marked by a patchwork of varying levels of lockdown and mask mandates because it was decided state-by-state.
If we're screwing around and throwing international treaties at it, I'm presuming that this bypasses the states entirely and is decided at Federal level.
Can't have Florida having all the old people but less death rates than the blue masked up jabbed up states. Makes too many people think.