The problem with mass immigrations to fill labor demand is that these are unskilled workers with 0 desire to work for the most part. So most end up draining their new countries social safety nets, and the few that do work end up taking whatever unskilled jobs away from the unskilled local population throwing them onto the social safety net instead. If you have a worker shortage reduce taxes to encourage companies to get visas for high skilled foreigners and encourage a rise in local birth rates with reduced taxes.
There are more problems with immigration, the discussion however is never done in a logical manner.
Cons:
The obvious cultural and national identity cost - you can not maintain a national and cultural identity and at the same time have mass immigration
Potential rise in terrorist attacks or other crimes, rape, grenade attacks etc
Increase division in the country, this leads to unhappiness no mater what side you are on
You are left opened to identity politics and interest group exploitations that most often translate to laws that allow or encourage discrimination against ethnic nationals
Wage stagnation for unskilled workers and greater inequality - the left always forgets this part
Pros:
It helps the economy as long as you get enough immigrants to work while not allowing them social security payments - of course the second part is racist so no one will put any limits on that.
People will not call you as racist as other countries but you will always be racist as long as you have an ethnic European majority.
How many would vote for mass immigration if immigration was explained like this. You and your kids will be discriminated, your ethnic and cultural heritage will be desecrated but the rich will grow richer.
Literally no population votes for mass immigration. No poll has ever shown majority support for it in any country ever. What they do is bundle immigration with every other left wing issue so that people “vote” for it.
The problem with mass immigrations to fill labor demand is that these are unskilled workers with 0 desire to work for the most part. So most end up draining their new countries social safety nets, and the few that do work end up taking whatever unskilled jobs away from the unskilled local population throwing them onto the social safety net instead. If you have a worker shortage reduce taxes to encourage companies to get visas for high skilled foreigners and encourage a rise in local birth rates with reduced taxes.
There are more problems with immigration, the discussion however is never done in a logical manner.
Cons:
The obvious cultural and national identity cost - you can not maintain a national and cultural identity and at the same time have mass immigration
Potential rise in terrorist attacks or other crimes, rape, grenade attacks etc
Increase division in the country, this leads to unhappiness no mater what side you are on
You are left opened to identity politics and interest group exploitations that most often translate to laws that allow or encourage discrimination against ethnic nationals
Wage stagnation for unskilled workers and greater inequality - the left always forgets this part
Pros:
It helps the economy as long as you get enough immigrants to work while not allowing them social security payments - of course the second part is racist so no one will put any limits on that.
People will not call you as racist as other countries but you will always be racist as long as you have an ethnic European majority.
How many would vote for mass immigration if immigration was explained like this. You and your kids will be discriminated, your ethnic and cultural heritage will be desecrated but the rich will grow richer.
Literally no population votes for mass immigration. No poll has ever shown majority support for it in any country ever. What they do is bundle immigration with every other left wing issue so that people “vote” for it.