You want your case to be air-tight, otherwise they'll come back one day claiming that they were targeted by rigged courts. Even if you could force guilty verdicts, you need to have enough evidence to show everyone what happened if you want it to make a lasting difference.
If one possesses the power, one would not need to prove malice.
There's one of the intermediate steps for you.
You want your case to be air-tight, otherwise they'll come back one day claiming that they were targeted by rigged courts. Even if you could force guilty verdicts, you need to have enough evidence to show everyone what happened if you want it to make a lasting difference.
It does not matter if your case is air-tight. The claims will be made regardless. You do not need evidence, all you need is power.