What was interesting to me is that I have family that work in finance, and so I always argued in my physics class that accounting was to economics, what quantumn mechanics is to general relativity.

There is no question that one is emergent from the other, and that the larger is simply the infinite number of individual actions of the smaller. It's just hard to unify them because of their scope, but they are literally not different. They are part of the same system.

AA's explanations on Austrian School Economics just formalized what I had already thought existed.

Also, any time I would have conversations like that, people who were in economics would tell me that this had been established economic science for over 100 years. This was basically the same complaint that physicists have in regards to "scientific literacy" and why "science communicators" exist: the average person doesn't have any scientific knowledge that was established after the 18th century.

Instead the only education in economics I ever got was fairly high-level macro-economics from Keynsian perspectives at best, that never seemed to make any sense... the reason why is because Keynsian socialist monetary systems are fucking nonsense, like all Socialism.