Someone on one of the KIA Faggit subs said never to trust that site for archiving purposes years ago. This is proof it was good advice that I was correct to follow. I always kind of cringe when I see that site used.
It’s been pozzed for a long time just less widely talked about. They can get away with it easier because it’s basically just a matter of saying “oh no we didn’t archive that!”
Right. But it can't archive anything that they receive a cease and desist order over. And it's the only resource we have. And you're sitting there telling us it's bad, and presumably not to use it because some guy said something on a website one time, and you thought him and his website that you were visiting are fags.
Nice list of backup sites you just dropped on me. I can't refute that. It's amazing to think that the list of archiving sites you just diligently researched and compiled, will be archived on all of them! /s
I'm talking about when people deliberately use it to archive things when they should be using .is or something similar. It's different if .org has the only archive that exists, but even then it makes sense to use a better site to grab an archive of that archive so we don't have to worry about bad actors covering their tracks.
Someone on one of the KIA Faggit subs said never to trust that site for archiving purposes years ago. This is proof it was good advice that I was correct to follow. I always kind of cringe when I see that site used.
It’s been pozzed for a long time just less widely talked about. They can get away with it easier because it’s basically just a matter of saying “oh no we didn’t archive that!”
Right. But it can't archive anything that they receive a cease and desist order over. And it's the only resource we have. And you're sitting there telling us it's bad, and presumably not to use it because some guy said something on a website one time, and you thought him and his website that you were visiting are fags.
that is some real shaky logic you've got there.
Nice list of backup sites you just dropped on me. I can't refute that. It's amazing to think that the list of archiving sites you just diligently researched and compiled, will be archived on all of them! /s
I'm talking about when people deliberately use it to archive things when they should be using .is or something similar. It's different if .org has the only archive that exists, but even then it makes sense to use a better site to grab an archive of that archive so we don't have to worry about bad actors covering their tracks.
Thank you for clarifying your statement.