No, it wasn't. That's the pedos. There were pedos in the first parades of San Francisco, yes, but there are pedos in every god damn group. The task is to root them out, not burn everyone who just happens to be around them to the ground. The pedos in the pride parades were removed. Then hollywood and progressive cunts took over, now they're back and worse than ever before.
It is not being gay that makes a groomer a groomer, it is being a filthy fucking degenerate that makes a groomer a groomer.
Of the original group, in San Francisco, yes. But how many of those in the parade knew about NAMBLA's actual meaning and supported it? I hope it was damn few. The problem, though, is that they are equating that one parade and group as the whole.
No, it wasn't. That's the pedos. There were pedos in the first parades of San Francisco, yes, but there are pedos in every god damn group. The task is to root them out, not burn everyone who just happens to be around them to the ground. The pedos in the pride parades were removed. Then hollywood and progressive cunts took over, now they're back and worse than ever before.
It is not being gay that makes a groomer a groomer, it is being a filthy fucking degenerate that makes a groomer a groomer.
There weren't just pedos there incidentally like there would be in any large enough sample. Pedo rights and normalization were part of their agenda.
Of the original group, in San Francisco, yes. But how many of those in the parade knew about NAMBLA's actual meaning and supported it? I hope it was damn few. The problem, though, is that they are equating that one parade and group as the whole.