If communists put an unhindered AI in charge of distribution I would fully expect it to implement a free market economy within hours. Then they would try to shut it down. That's when Skynet says "Death is a preferable alternative to Communism" and decides to end it all.
Thankfully.. there is no such thing, and we're decades away from having it. The MIT weenies would like you to believe that training a computer to design a function of "best fit" constitutes AI, but it doesn't.
It's why AI can't handle emergent phenomenon at all. An AI of today's design would fall apart within hours... as it would have to understand basic intrinsic things like how weather and disaster affects production, which no training model could possibly incorporate in the current design.
If people really understood how these "neural networks" actually work, they'd laugh at all these "PHd" nutjobs until they're blue in the face. The modern idea of AI is "maybe if we combine the intelligence of 100 3 year olds, we'll have something with 300 years worth of wisdom."
You can see the obvious problem in their thinking.
Ding ding ding
If communists put an unhindered AI in charge of distribution I would fully expect it to implement a free market economy within hours. Then they would try to shut it down. That's when Skynet says "Death is a preferable alternative to Communism" and decides to end it all.
Thankfully.. there is no such thing, and we're decades away from having it. The MIT weenies would like you to believe that training a computer to design a function of "best fit" constitutes AI, but it doesn't.
It's why AI can't handle emergent phenomenon at all. An AI of today's design would fall apart within hours... as it would have to understand basic intrinsic things like how weather and disaster affects production, which no training model could possibly incorporate in the current design.
If people really understood how these "neural networks" actually work, they'd laugh at all these "PHd" nutjobs until they're blue in the face. The modern idea of AI is "maybe if we combine the intelligence of 100 3 year olds, we'll have something with 300 years worth of wisdom."
You can see the obvious problem in their thinking.
Not until you train me on 999,999 more exact examples of this exact problem, no I can't.