I don't know why you guys are arguing past one another. It's possible that unions and foreign laborers are both bad. Used to be the unions were against unfettered immigration because they are competing interests, both of which can harm the economy in different ways.
I wouldn't say we are arguing past each other. There is a huge contradiction between being some sort of conservative or right-winger and stanning corporations. It needs to be explored or else right-wing movements will just be eternal simps for our corporate enemies. It's actually a huge problem on the so-called right, perhaps its biggest problem, even.
-Corporate greed? If it's legally an option why wouldn't a business do it? It's not a charity. Don't want temp workers taking jobs? That's a government legislation issue.
I never said they wouldn't be tempted to do it. Why do you think I suggested harsh penalties for doing so. I didn't realize not wanting to flood your country with legally retarded migrants was so controversial around here. LOL
-The Hostess factories closed because of union greed. But I guess that type of greed is ok?
It is less damaging. Unions can't implement demographic replacement. You do realize that the unionization rate has fallen in Canada since the 1980s, right? It's also fallen a lot in the US, and as I said, the US has a similar problem with high housing costs, especially in and around cities.
I don't say this to insult you, but your corporate greed finger pointing makes you sound like a clueless Marxist.
Marxism is when you oppose demographic replacement. LOL
Have you ever worked a trade and have experience with unions?
Nope, but I have lots of experience living in a country in the advanced stages of demographic replacement.
I never said unions can't contribute to the problem. They certainly can. As I said, unionization rates are in decline. It makes no sense to claim they are driving immigration and recent housing cost increases.
I don't know why you guys are arguing past one another. It's possible that unions and foreign laborers are both bad. Used to be the unions were against unfettered immigration because they are competing interests, both of which can harm the economy in different ways.
I wouldn't say we are arguing past each other. There is a huge contradiction between being some sort of conservative or right-winger and stanning corporations. It needs to be explored or else right-wing movements will just be eternal simps for our corporate enemies. It's actually a huge problem on the so-called right, perhaps its biggest problem, even.
I never said they wouldn't be tempted to do it. Why do you think I suggested harsh penalties for doing so. I didn't realize not wanting to flood your country with legally retarded migrants was so controversial around here. LOL
It is less damaging. Unions can't implement demographic replacement. You do realize that the unionization rate has fallen in Canada since the 1980s, right? It's also fallen a lot in the US, and as I said, the US has a similar problem with high housing costs, especially in and around cities.
Marxism is when you oppose demographic replacement. LOL
Nope, but I have lots of experience living in a country in the advanced stages of demographic replacement.
I never said unions can't contribute to the problem. They certainly can. As I said, unionization rates are in decline. It makes no sense to claim they are driving immigration and recent housing cost increases.
yeh why not have a child slave force, if theres no LAW against it! lmfao shitlib
but there is a law against it, except where there isn't, and there they do do it, so I'm unclear on what point what made here