I just told you to use better sources, like the one I did find for you as an example. And which you just ignored and didn't even check, judging on your second paragraph.
And yet I did exactly that, while you just ignored my link entirely (not even when I noted it's a better source saying just that, and how I found it for you to use instead, as an example) and began ranting.
I admited it, very obviously, by posting this link and just telling you it's an example of what you should have used instead of your use of a compromised dictionary.
I so clearly told you I "found it, for you, as an example".
I just told you to use better sources, like the one I did find for you as an example. And which you just ignored and didn't even check, judging on your second paragraph.
And yet I did exactly that, while you just ignored my link entirely (not even when I noted it's a better source saying just that, and how I found it for you to use instead, as an example) and began ranting.
I admited it, very obviously, by posting this link and just telling you it's an example of what you should have used instead of your use of a compromised dictionary.
I so clearly told you I "found it, for you, as an example".
And I see you're just so autistic you still can't see I did.
And to repeat my point, use written sources like that instead of online dictionaries (or Wikipedia for that matter).
It obviously is.