The guys in the unit today are actually pretty apolitical and very professional. Now, those in the vast Azov civilian movement are very political but they also lost the actual popular support (even in a coalition with other radicals they lost all the seats in the parliament) while the nation elected an openly Jewish president, so I don't see them too as a problem, they're just a colorful margin of the society (sort of like the Italian Neo-Fascists nowadays). Contrary to the Russian propaganda (and also the Western hysteria).
I was talking about Ukrainian nation (writing "the nation"), not any "a Nationalist Socialist". You really have serious problems with comprehension and then just begin ranting once triggered.
The guys in the unit today are actually pretty apolitical and very professional. Now, those in the vast Azov civilian movement are very political but they also lost the actual popular support (even in a coalition with other radicals they lost all the seats in the parliament) while the nation elected an openly Jewish president, so I don't see them too as a problem, they're just a colorful margin of the society (sort of like the Italian Neo-Fascists nowadays). Contrary to the Russian propaganda (and also the Western hysteria).
No, they're not "big trouble", they're as irrelevant in the big picture as they're colorful. This is an example of the Western hysteria I just mentioned too.
In case of you really didn't notice, I was talking about this section of your second paragraph, which I'll even quote now:
Can't "show and tell" about something that just never happened.
They weren't "bombing" (nor bombarding) anything at all.
Unless the use of tanks and mortars at the Shirokino (an abandoned sea resort turned a fortified battlefield) frontline counts. Which I mentioned.
If you just stopped rambling like a retard and tried to read, maybe you could notice what I actually talked about to you.
While I wasn't talking about anything I wasn't talking about. Maybe it's actually hard to you to comprehend.
The guys in the unit today are actually pretty apolitical and very professional. Now, those in the vast Azov civilian movement are very political but they also lost the actual popular support (even in a coalition with other radicals they lost all the seats in the parliament) while the nation elected an openly Jewish president, so I don't see them too as a problem, they're just a colorful margin of the society (sort of like the Italian Neo-Fascists nowadays). Contrary to the Russian propaganda (and also the Western hysteria).
I was talking about Ukrainian nation (writing "the nation"), not any "a Nationalist Socialist". You really have serious problems with comprehension and then just begin ranting once triggered.
To repeat to you, once you calmed down hopefully:
The guys in the unit today are actually pretty apolitical and very professional. Now, those in the vast Azov civilian movement are very political but they also lost the actual popular support (even in a coalition with other radicals they lost all the seats in the parliament) while the nation elected an openly Jewish president, so I don't see them too as a problem, they're just a colorful margin of the society (sort of like the Italian Neo-Fascists nowadays). Contrary to the Russian propaganda (and also the Western hysteria).
And going back to the original Salon article, the subject of this thread:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FN0DtXiXIAUGauL?format=jpg&name=900x900
No, they're not "big trouble", they're as irrelevant in the big picture as they're colorful. This is an example of the Western hysteria I just mentioned too.
You too are a histrionic Westerner, obviously.