You should realize: The YGL and even the WEF are not nearly as (uniformly) nefarious as alt-media people like to think. Sure, the Davos set is shady as hell, but outside of that, it's like a 4H club for graduate students, especially business schools. The World Economic Council is like this too. Spooky in theory, really dull in practice.
I've been to WEF conferences. Not very interesting. Wear a 3-piece suit and eat a 5-course meal in the mid-morning while listening to some TED talk about currency. Impress an important person with your impeccable manners and ability to carry on trite conversation while waving a glass of champagne around, and get recognized for YGL, which is an up-jumped merit badge.
No doubt some matriculates of these things go on to do bigger and darker things. But just because you at some point got tagged by these enterprises--like an endangered penguin--doesn't mean you're a functioning agent of the NWO.
Put it this way: It's unlikely that Putin's YGL affiliation what made him interesting. But as a potent dude, it wasn't unlikely from him to have picked up that affiliation along the way.
Okay, but what I'm trying to do here is clean up your process of recognizing who exactly is "involved in the wef." When I see someone point to YGL on a resume, or having been in the same room as Klaus Schwab at some point, and going on to consider that person indelibly compromised, it's an eye-roll.
I'm fine with us walking away from it each thinking the other's view on the subject is dumb as hell. But in reality, one of our perspectives is dumb as hell.
You should realize: The YGL and even the WEF are not nearly as (uniformly) nefarious as alt-media people like to think. Sure, the Davos set is shady as hell, but outside of that, it's like a 4H club for graduate students, especially business schools. The World Economic Council is like this too. Spooky in theory, really dull in practice.
I've been to WEF conferences. Not very interesting. Wear a 3-piece suit and eat a 5-course meal in the mid-morning while listening to some TED talk about currency. Impress an important person with your impeccable manners and ability to carry on trite conversation while waving a glass of champagne around, and get recognized for YGL, which is an up-jumped merit badge.
No doubt some matriculates of these things go on to do bigger and darker things. But just because you at some point got tagged by these enterprises--like an endangered penguin--doesn't mean you're a functioning agent of the NWO.
Put it this way: It's unlikely that Putin's YGL affiliation what made him interesting. But as a potent dude, it wasn't unlikely from him to have picked up that affiliation along the way.
everyone involved in the wef needs to die.
Okay, but what I'm trying to do here is clean up your process of recognizing who exactly is "involved in the wef." When I see someone point to YGL on a resume, or having been in the same room as Klaus Schwab at some point, and going on to consider that person indelibly compromised, it's an eye-roll.
I'm fine with us walking away from it each thinking the other's view on the subject is dumb as hell. But in reality, one of our perspectives is dumb as hell.
compromised is compromised.