You should realize: The YGL and even the WEF are not nearly as (uniformly) nefarious as alt-media people like to think. Sure, the Davos set is shady as hell, but outside of that, it's like a 4H club for graduate students, especially business schools. The World Economic Council is like this too. Spooky in theory, really dull in practice.
I've been to WEF conferences. Not very interesting. Wear a 3-piece suit and eat a 5-course meal in the mid-morning while listening to some TED talk about currency. Impress an important person with your impeccable manners and ability to carry on trite conversation while waving a glass of champagne around, and get recognized for YGL, which is an up-jumped merit badge.
No doubt some matriculates of these things go on to do bigger and darker things. But just because you at some point got tagged by these enterprises--like an endangered penguin--doesn't mean you're a functioning agent of the NWO.
Put it this way: It's unlikely that Putin's YGL affiliation what made him interesting. But as a potent dude, it wasn't unlikely from him to have picked up that affiliation along the way.
Something tells me you were not invited to any important or relevant conversations. Just the smoke-screen public front. Right, right. You sat down at tables with economic policy advisors to active governments. Whatever, son.
Okay. I mean, yes, I did, several times. Because if you're attending a b-school in a major City, as I was, this is a thing you're encouraged to do. If you're planning on going for Goldman Sachs, or Vanguard, or McKinsey, Deloitte, Booz Allen, etc etc., this is part of the "soft skills" program that you're supposed to be developing. It's utterly garden variety, and every year thousands--maybe tens of thousands--of grad students do the exact same thing. Just because you've not been party to it, doesn't make it exotic.
Maybe I wasn't invited to the "important or relevant" conversations; This is my point. Assuredly, because the bulk of the conversations aren't important or relevant.
I'm not sure why this is hard to get across, it comes back to the same premise: Just because someone at some point was recognized by these entities, does not make them an agent of these agencies. You should look to what else they've done and are doing. That YGL on the resume is nigh-meaningless: The most obvious actual meaning is that this person was at some point in the top 5% of their business class. I've got YGL on my Christmas card list, so I estimate that for every alumni ruling Russia or in the Senate, 99 are managing a small gas provider in upstate New York.
You should realize: The YGL and even the WEF are not nearly as (uniformly) nefarious as alt-media people like to think. Sure, the Davos set is shady as hell, but outside of that, it's like a 4H club for graduate students, especially business schools. The World Economic Council is like this too. Spooky in theory, really dull in practice.
I've been to WEF conferences. Not very interesting. Wear a 3-piece suit and eat a 5-course meal in the mid-morning while listening to some TED talk about currency. Impress an important person with your impeccable manners and ability to carry on trite conversation while waving a glass of champagne around, and get recognized for YGL, which is an up-jumped merit badge.
No doubt some matriculates of these things go on to do bigger and darker things. But just because you at some point got tagged by these enterprises--like an endangered penguin--doesn't mean you're a functioning agent of the NWO.
Put it this way: It's unlikely that Putin's YGL affiliation what made him interesting. But as a potent dude, it wasn't unlikely from him to have picked up that affiliation along the way.
Something tells me you were not invited to any important or relevant conversations. Just the smoke-screen public front. Right, right. You sat down at tables with economic policy advisors to active governments. Whatever, son.
Okay. I mean, yes, I did, several times. Because if you're attending a b-school in a major City, as I was, this is a thing you're encouraged to do. If you're planning on going for Goldman Sachs, or Vanguard, or McKinsey, Deloitte, Booz Allen, etc etc., this is part of the "soft skills" program that you're supposed to be developing. It's utterly garden variety, and every year thousands--maybe tens of thousands--of grad students do the exact same thing. Just because you've not been party to it, doesn't make it exotic.
Maybe I wasn't invited to the "important or relevant" conversations; This is my point. Assuredly, because the bulk of the conversations aren't important or relevant.
I'm not sure why this is hard to get across, it comes back to the same premise: Just because someone at some point was recognized by these entities, does not make them an agent of these agencies. You should look to what else they've done and are doing. That YGL on the resume is nigh-meaningless: The most obvious actual meaning is that this person was at some point in the top 5% of their business class. I've got YGL on my Christmas card list, so I estimate that for every alumni ruling Russia or in the Senate, 99 are managing a small gas provider in upstate New York.