As far as I'm aware, every single signer of the constitution were in favor of obscenity laws. They didn't even think this was a question worthy of discussion.
The work around is saying there must be some artistic value to it. For awhile courts used to have to watch pornos and decide whether or not they had artistic value.
Porn is not free speech.
As far as I'm aware, every single signer of the constitution were in favor of obscenity laws. They didn't even think this was a question worthy of discussion.
The work around is saying there must be some artistic value to it. For awhile courts used to have to watch pornos and decide whether or not they had artistic value.
Thus the lazy attempts at "story" or "plot".
Porn is free speech. Because you want to choose what is, and is not freedom or expression. Off to russia with you.