Why can't we advocate for violence from a nation-state perspective?
Why is that a conversation we're only allowed to have from one side?
It's pretty ridiculous how blatant and obvious it is once you break it down.
You can shout from the rooftops, on live tv, and in every article that we should go to war with Russia... yet even attempt to say that Russia is justified and you're immediately excluded from debate.
I like the random dude offscreen yelling about how the shelling of Donbass didn't happen. I bet that guy is some kind of intelligence asset plant.
Why can't we advocate for violence from a nation-state perspective?
Why is that a conversation we're only allowed to have from one side?
It's pretty ridiculous how blatant and obvious it is once you break it down.
You can shout from the rooftops, on live tv, and in every article that we should go to war with Russia... yet even attempt to say that Russia is justified and you're immediately excluded from debate.
I like the random dude offscreen yelling about how the shelling of Donbass didn't happen. I bet that guy is some kind of intelligence asset plant.
Everyone certainly advocated for nation-state violence when it came to getting the US entangled in world wars.