If they're going to anyway, maybe they should be required to rule on scientific fact the same way they rule on legal interpretation. Use actual experts to present facts that can be compared, instead of judges just going by what the government says (great precedent there).
"But muh courts can't rule on science"
If they're going to anyway, maybe they should be required to rule on scientific fact the same way they rule on legal interpretation. Use actual experts to present facts that can be compared, instead of judges just going by what the government says (great precedent there).