I'm mean, the info he presented isn't wrong. Multiculturalism is cancer in any society, and any political ideology that refuses to admit that is destined to fail. Aristotle talked about this, and it's why the Soviets worked so hard to vilify concepts like nationalism and racial preference in the union, while also using multicultural racial tension as a subversive tool against the west. Ignoring in-group preferences and our tribal nature is a LARP, and pretending that races and cultures don't have inherent, irreconcilable differences is disastrous, especially for any kind of merit based system. In the end, it forces the state to abandon its primary demographic (current western civilization: DIE hiring, anti-white/christian rhetoric, etc.) or be xenophobic/unwelcoming/nationalistic in regards to foreign cultures and races.
In true pinko, midwit fashion, he's presenting this info in its weaponized form and coming to a conclusion that is incorrect.
He's presented an argument against multiculturalism, and then said we need to double down on multiculturalism to the point that the host nation's culture is irrelevant all racial identity (even that of the non-whites) is erased. This is your brain on bolshevism.
They think once they take out the "dominate" culture.. all the small, minor cultures will all suddenly get along. All the muslims, rainbow lgbt, blacks, mexicans, chinese, atheists, etc etc.. lol.
Idk, I guess it depends on which version of communism they favor. Trotsky was one of the big purveyors of the weaponization of national/racial identity; and his model, Permanent Revolution, involved continuously destroying the bourgeoisie (racial/cultural/religious majority in this iteration of communism) until every one of them [racial majority, regardless of skin tone/identity et. al] had been eliminated globally. He believed that every bourgeois that the revolution eliminated was immediately replaced by a foreign capitalist and that therefore, everytime a new capitalist sprang up out of the ashes of a dead capitalist, the new capitalist would have to be destroyed as well; and that would continue on until there were no capitalists [cultural majorities] left.
That would honestly be more in line with The Protocols, and also the beliefs of communist thinkers like Moses Hess.
I'm mean, the info he presented isn't wrong. Multiculturalism is cancer in any society, and any political ideology that refuses to admit that is destined to fail. Aristotle talked about this, and it's why the Soviets worked so hard to vilify concepts like nationalism and racial preference in the union, while also using multicultural racial tension as a subversive tool against the west. Ignoring in-group preferences and our tribal nature is a LARP, and pretending that races and cultures don't have inherent, irreconcilable differences is disastrous, especially for any kind of merit based system. In the end, it forces the state to abandon its primary demographic (current western civilization: DIE hiring, anti-white/christian rhetoric, etc.) or be xenophobic/unwelcoming/nationalistic in regards to foreign cultures and races.
In true pinko, midwit fashion, he's presenting this info in its weaponized form and coming to a conclusion that is incorrect.
He's presented an argument against multiculturalism, and then said we need to double down on multiculturalism to the point that the host nation's culture is irrelevant all racial identity (even that of the non-whites) is erased. This is your brain on bolshevism.
They think once they take out the "dominate" culture.. all the small, minor cultures will all suddenly get along. All the muslims, rainbow lgbt, blacks, mexicans, chinese, atheists, etc etc.. lol.
Idk, I guess it depends on which version of communism they favor. Trotsky was one of the big purveyors of the weaponization of national/racial identity; and his model, Permanent Revolution, involved continuously destroying the bourgeoisie (racial/cultural/religious majority in this iteration of communism) until every one of them [racial majority, regardless of skin tone/identity et. al] had been eliminated globally. He believed that every bourgeois that the revolution eliminated was immediately replaced by a foreign capitalist and that therefore, everytime a new capitalist sprang up out of the ashes of a dead capitalist, the new capitalist would have to be destroyed as well; and that would continue on until there were no capitalists [cultural majorities] left.
That would honestly be more in line with The Protocols, and also the beliefs of communist thinkers like Moses Hess.