No, but Christine Lagarde is. Why don't we ask her why she approved a €1.7bn bailout to Ukraine and then their requirement for women to fight disappeared, replaced by something more palatable to her nature.
Oh the Ukrainians violated it. Not the Russians who claim they aren’t required to abide by it claiming they aren’t part of the conflict. Even though the entirety of the rebels are backed by Russia via weapons and funds and most likely “mercenaries.” Ukraine should just hand over a chunk of land to Russia every few years after Russia settles people into Ukrainian territory and start a separatist movement. Maybe you shouldn’t read RT for your news on Russia
No, but Christine Lagarde is. Why don't we ask her why she approved a €1.7bn bailout to Ukraine and then their requirement for women to fight disappeared, replaced by something more palatable to her nature.
How did that cause the war? In what way did that spur the Russian army to invade?
When the Ukrainian military violated the Minsk agreement straight after and attacked the Russian-aligned Luhansk region.
Oh the Ukrainians violated it. Not the Russians who claim they aren’t required to abide by it claiming they aren’t part of the conflict. Even though the entirety of the rebels are backed by Russia via weapons and funds and most likely “mercenaries.” Ukraine should just hand over a chunk of land to Russia every few years after Russia settles people into Ukrainian territory and start a separatist movement. Maybe you shouldn’t read RT for your news on Russia
Oh, you mean Ukraine?
There's a reason why this is a Civil War. It doesn't actually belong to Russia.