Good thing you apologized
(archive.is)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
The article holds out until the fourth paragraph before specifying that Rogan was talking about boys fucking older women. Because the author knows that people don't really care about boys being raped by women. The public only cares about girls being raped by men, so the article plays it totally ambiguous for as long as possible in order to let the reader assume the worst.
It's a well-known phenomenon that readership drops off dramatically the further down an article you get. Propagandists know this, and they often intentionally use it to tell half-truths to thousands or even millions of people with no repercussions.