I'm afraid that's as much of a pipe-dream as your belief that you could persuade the entire world to hate women if you were allowed on television for 3 minutes.
To set them against each other, you would have to show how their interests clash right at this moment. For example, the massively disproportionate rates of rape among black men.
Maybe three minutes was optimistic, but half an hour, maybe an hour, with a lot of careful planning and "experts" backing me up? Fauci programmed people to think a certain way with less.
You don't think they'd be angry at women for allowing them to be lynched so women could vote? They're still angry about slavery and that's even further back.
Also, that would make women look like the good side, which is obviously not something I want. I want to force everyone to admit anti-racism is nothing more than letting feminists tell you what to say and acting virtuous.
Maybe three minutes was optimistic, but half an hour, maybe an hour
And you think people are not going to tune you out when you start claiming that women are Nazis and your other charming views? Or is it like Clockwork Orange, where they are forced to watch and at the end they're suddenly converted to the truth?
If you cannot convert me, or anyone else here, with an unlimited amount of preaching opportunities - what are the chances of you converting the average normie?
Fauci programmed people to think a certain way with less.
He had something to work with.
You don't think they'd be angry at women for allowing them to be lynched so women could vote? They're still angry about slavery and that's even further back.
They're angry because it's politically beneficial to be angry. It will not be politically beneficial to be angry at long-dead women, nor would it have any consequences for current affairs.
I want to force everyone to admit anti-racism is nothing more than letting feminists tell you what to say and acting virtuous.
Would you hope to accomplish anything with that, or just waste it?
Buy 20 Ferraris instead.
I would hope to set the two most progressive groups against each other.
I'm afraid that's as much of a pipe-dream as your belief that you could persuade the entire world to hate women if you were allowed on television for 3 minutes.
To set them against each other, you would have to show how their interests clash right at this moment. For example, the massively disproportionate rates of rape among black men.
Maybe three minutes was optimistic, but half an hour, maybe an hour, with a lot of careful planning and "experts" backing me up? Fauci programmed people to think a certain way with less.
You don't think they'd be angry at women for allowing them to be lynched so women could vote? They're still angry about slavery and that's even further back.
Also, that would make women look like the good side, which is obviously not something I want. I want to force everyone to admit anti-racism is nothing more than letting feminists tell you what to say and acting virtuous.
And you think people are not going to tune you out when you start claiming that women are Nazis and your other charming views? Or is it like Clockwork Orange, where they are forced to watch and at the end they're suddenly converted to the truth?
If you cannot convert me, or anyone else here, with an unlimited amount of preaching opportunities - what are the chances of you converting the average normie?
He had something to work with.
They're angry because it's politically beneficial to be angry. It will not be politically beneficial to be angry at long-dead women, nor would it have any consequences for current affairs.
You simply don't have the evidence for that.
20 Ferraris? I think you're overestimating the currency ,Comrade. That is clearly only two loaves of bread. Hurry next week, It's only one loaf!