I decided to try out tinder and discovered the site is absolute garbage. There are no real browsing options, interest selection is limited, there are fucking trannies who failed to properly disclose their status so they show up where they shouldn't, and it prohibits you from manually disclosing your location by forcing you to use location services.
Edit: Was likely banned for saying in the account description I hate regressive leftists and muslims, and also for saying I hate gender identity. Another possibility was that defending lolicon got me wrongfully banned for pro-pedo speech.
I assume you mean username, because nobody here knows my actual name.
As for what my reputation is for, my central belief is that feminists were not simply being satirical when they wrote long winded manifestos about how they would kill all men, but these were actually a plot that would be executed by women aligned with their ideology who acquired power positions.
Think communist "Long March through the Institutions" and you're not far off.
I usually refer back to this specific paragraph, which is the stated goal of the inventor of Gender Studies.
A while ago, Boris Johnson mentioned building the world in a "More Feminine Way" and this raised my level of credibility on whether I was right or not.
Since then, I've been talking a lot about myocarditis and all of my predictions were in-line with what studies have given.
I don't actually hate women, as much as people think I do. I just don't trust them. I have my reasons, I've seen some shit in my life. I'm glad me and my family have never truly experienced the dark side of our "better halves" .
Ah, right. I think I generally agree with you -- but I disagree broadly it's intentional.
You keep doing what you're doing -- I don't think you're wholly wrong. I just think most can be saved because they're mostly 'following along.' If the TV told them to get married and make babies tomorrow, that would start to be the cultural norm.
EDIT: to add: the powers that be would love to use women's inequality as a shield to advance their agenda -- I think you and I can agree on that point
This is something I'm very conflicted on. Feminist ideology states to fake what you believe if it advances the cause, this was in the SCUM Manifesto, which is still taught in women's studies.
Logically, this means anyone who ever was a feminist is unsaveable (sounds like that cult from GTA V. Didn't they call their enemies unsaveables?)
However, it's also logical that most people would join a group that claims to act in their self-interest, purely to make financial gains out of the policy it creates.
Where do you draw the line between More Feminine Way™ true believers and those who are acting in self interest and don't actually desire anyone to be killed, but just want preferential treatment because...everyone loves an easier life.
Relatively simple, actually:
I went to graduate school for Sociology of all things (very expensive red pill, don't recommend), but I met the real hardcore feminists -- the Andrea Dworkins of a new age.
It's a completely separate case for the ones who studied it and knew better -- I think this is all a perversion of human biopsychology, and both the feminists and TheRedPill have more or less cracked the code.
Anyone who in any way shape or form knew the biological mechanisms that were being manipulated? Crimes Against Humanity.
Anyone else? Eh, they'll feel differently when the media tells them to.
We do know your name, Jeff. Welcome to the nerd club. Where women are real. They can be yours if you give up all your waifus. and a Dollar