The problem is that leftoids are purely materialistic, and are unable to identify the problem let alone come up with solutions. The best they can do is "uhh people work too much for le 1% or something. They should work less for poor people. I guess". They are unable to express the existential discontentment and spiritual hollowness of being a wage cuck. They even misunderstand Office Space they talked about. The characters in there weren't miserable because "they worked too much", most of the movie was about how they don't do shit all the time basically. The movie literally ends with the programmer getting a blue collar job in which he is more satisfied because the work he does is more tangible and fulfilling. But that dimension is invisible to the commies. They vaguely brush up against it with their delusional "well I want to be a philosophy teacher in the commune" but it never really escapes the materialist analysis.
The problem is that leftoids are purely materialistic, and are unable to identify the problem let alone come up with solutions. The best they can do is "uhh people work too much for le 1% or something. They should work less for poor people. I guess". They are unable to express the existential discontentment and spiritual hollowness of being a wage cuck. They even misunderstand Office Space they talked about. The characters in there weren't miserable because "they worked too much", most of the movie was about how they don't do shit all the time basically. The movie literally ends with the programmer getting a blue collar job in which he is more satisfied because the work he does is more tangible and fulfilling. But that dimension is invisible to the commies. They vaguely brush up against it with their delusional "well I want to be a philosophy teacher in the commune" but it never really escapes the materialist analysis.
no the movie literally ends with the stapler guy on an island
Office Space was not the story of Milton; it was the story of Peter.