Yet more male births is perfectly natural. 105:100 is the usual ratio, backed by years of data.
That's what all these "leaders" puppeted by feminism forget. Their majority female population is highly unnatural and I'd put money on it being even higher majorities if you take out the recent immigrants from the refugee circlejerk. Maybe that's why they did it, so people didn't see 53-54% female and go - aren't we accusing China of endorsing genocide for this but the other way?
What has a majority female population given us? The worst society in a hundred years.
This isn't news, nor is it new.
China's ratio has been out of whack for decades.
Yes, it is.
A male skewed population imbalance is a recipe for societal unrest and intergenerational warfare.
China has basically two options. They can either expend that imbalance in a foreign war, or wait until the imbalance precipitates a civil war.
Yet more male births is perfectly natural. 105:100 is the usual ratio, backed by years of data.
That's what all these "leaders" puppeted by feminism forget. Their majority female population is highly unnatural and I'd put money on it being even higher majorities if you take out the recent immigrants from the refugee circlejerk. Maybe that's why they did it, so people didn't see 53-54% female and go - aren't we accusing China of endorsing genocide for this but the other way?
What has a majority female population given us? The worst society in a hundred years.
Yes, and by the time they reach age 25 that ratio has been Darwin awarded down to 99:100.
I work in INSURANCE, TI1. I know firsthand how many young men get darwinned the second they get their hands on something with an engine.