So the traditional answer for these two groups (at least the ones in America) has always been "businesses have the right to fore any employee for any reason".
Now I get the sense that with the massive corporate abuse of power on free speech as well as this subject, opinions may be shifting.
But I am very interested in knowing what people think about this and why.
There's a significant difference between wearing something like a mask, and having something injected into your body. I don't believe the vast majority of businesses should have the right to force injections.
In the cases where an injection has a proven track record of safety, effectiveness, and actual necessity in limited situations, I could see a requirement. If you're working with rabid animals, or may be cut by rust, the risk of severe harm is high enough relative to any known danger of the relevant injection, and the profession is rare enough not to be something most people have to worry about.
Someone working minimum wage shouldn't be required to get the shot. If someone does take the shot because of a company, that company should have to report injuries (which isn't being done now), and should be liable.
For contracts, unless there is a requirement to take any future injection the employer requires, an employer would be violating the terms by changing them.
Diptherier? I hardly know her!