Exactly how I feel. It's a checklist of "vaccine hesitant" talking points. It confirms all my biases, altogether in one document. I just don't buy it. Even if I agree with the claims it's making, I don't think it's a credible document.
Could be wrong though. But my sense is, this is gonna get spread around with the intention of the usual rightwing suspects eating it up and sharing it, hinging their credibility on it, then it gets to be revealed to be a fake and the well gets poisoned.
This document is too “on the nose”
The chances that one author had evidence that Fauci funded covid19 AND that ivermectin works?
The data came originally via the DRASTIC group (last year) :
https://drasticresearch.org/2021/09/21/the-defuse-project-documents/
https://drasticresearch.files.wordpress.com/2021/10/preempt_hr00111880017_notes_v1_b-1.pdf
Exactly how I feel. It's a checklist of "vaccine hesitant" talking points. It confirms all my biases, altogether in one document. I just don't buy it. Even if I agree with the claims it's making, I don't think it's a credible document.
Could be wrong though. But my sense is, this is gonna get spread around with the intention of the usual rightwing suspects eating it up and sharing it, hinging their credibility on it, then it gets to be revealed to be a fake and the well gets poisoned.