My dude, I do like you, and I don't have and probably won't have children, but you really don't make a good point with this literal extinction rebellion bullshit of yours.
False equivalence, false dichotomy. Traditional men don't want to "give everything women want", they want women to be submissive and obedient to men, they want women to have no political power. Look at how White men acted 100 years ago, they knew women's place. You are confusing traditional men with neocons (who are not traditional at all).
Your "us vs them" mentality is retarded, there are many different types of people on the Right, with different beliefs, not everybody is a retarded simp cuckservative. In fact the very far right neo-Nazis are rarely simps, it's usually the moderate right who are the simping m'lady cucks.
Feminist women created a bioweapon specifically targeted at you, they want to kill you, and the best you can come up with is "muh tradcuckery is best".
Okay cool, so what's your solution? I know this is a hard concept for you to grasp, but whether you like it or not we need women in order to make babies in order to keep society from collapsing and going extinct.
So having a system where women are kept on a short leash, where they have no power and are submissive to men, is the best way to achieve that goal. That strategy has worked successfully for many thousands of years, it has led to the greatest civilizations in the world.
The far right are massive simping cucks, their whole ideology is based around simping and pretending women's nature was modified by the Jews, rather than organically revealing itself as the world become more developed.
I have no idea which "far right" people you talk to, but I know quite a few "far right" people, and they are very aware of female nature. They don't believe that women were brainwashed by Jews, they believe that the Jews simply unleashed women's innate desires by giving women freedom and removing the old traditions. Considering the very high percentage of Jews within the feminist movement, their viewpoint has some validity to it.
It was easier for them to advocate genocide than to criticise women. How much more cucked can you be?
Once again, I have no idea which "far right" people you are talking to, you seem to be confusing them with the neocon cuckservatives.
My dude, I do like you, and I don't have and probably won't have children, but you really don't make a good point with this literal extinction rebellion bullshit of yours.
False equivalence, false dichotomy. Traditional men don't want to "give everything women want", they want women to be submissive and obedient to men, they want women to have no political power. Look at how White men acted 100 years ago, they knew women's place. You are confusing traditional men with neocons (who are not traditional at all).
Your "us vs them" mentality is retarded, there are many different types of people on the Right, with different beliefs, not everybody is a retarded simp cuckservative. In fact the very far right neo-Nazis are rarely simps, it's usually the moderate right who are the simping m'lady cucks.
Okay cool, so what's your solution? I know this is a hard concept for you to grasp, but whether you like it or not we need women in order to make babies in order to keep society from collapsing and going extinct.
So having a system where women are kept on a short leash, where they have no power and are submissive to men, is the best way to achieve that goal. That strategy has worked successfully for many thousands of years, it has led to the greatest civilizations in the world.
I have no idea which "far right" people you talk to, but I know quite a few "far right" people, and they are very aware of female nature. They don't believe that women were brainwashed by Jews, they believe that the Jews simply unleashed women's innate desires by giving women freedom and removing the old traditions. Considering the very high percentage of Jews within the feminist movement, their viewpoint has some validity to it.
Once again, I have no idea which "far right" people you are talking to, you seem to be confusing them with the neocon cuckservatives.