The fact that this ridiculous story is still being talked about. We/they (What do you put when you're formerly from somewhere?) didn't have enquiries when social services were ignoring calls about abuse of adopted boys by lesbian couples. They didn't have enquiries about how the male suicide rate rocketed up under May. They didn't have enquiries about myocarditis. They didn't have enquires about all the men killed by women since Coercive Control.
Sarah Everard can burn in hell, if she even existed and isn't just a ploy to root out people in the police who are "misogynist" in preparation for something evil down the line.
So now you're attacking an innocent woman who as murdered because you don't like how she is used by rabid ideologues? That is low even by your standards.
root out people in the police who are "misogynist" in preparation for something evil down the line.
Often wrong but never in doubt. How many incorrect predictions will it take you to change your worldview? A trillion?
My conscience is clear. Her contribution to this world (if she existed) is producing yet more reasons for women in the UK to get violent. How many innocent people will be harmed as a direct result of policy brought in after this because "women can't trust police to defend them"?
I haven't been wrong that much. It's just that you remember when I'm wrong more often than when I'm right. Remember when I claimed the Pope was a feminist puppet and he pushed birth rates and vaxxes in one week?
It's not my claim. It was a popular conspiracy theory at the time that was silenced by social media. The theory stated that Everard never existed, and was simply a ploy by Carrie Symonds to ensure the government review into adding "misogyny" to the Prevent program, among other measures, could be justified. I even posted the government review's status, where it showed that a week after her death was announced was the date for a decision to be made. (The decision was to merge it with the Online Harms Bill pushed after the Euro 2020 racist tweet debacle.)
Her contribution to this world (if she existed) is producing yet more reasons for women in the UK to get violent.
You see, normal, sane people blame people only for something for which they are to blame. She is not to blame for being murdered by a psycho like you. If you want to be mad, be mad at the guy who murdered her - but that would defeat your raison d'etre of blaming women for everything. Now even a murder victim is to blame for your pathetic, sad, pitiful victim complex.
In the context where the vast majority of murders and assaults are commited by men against women, by the way.
Your conscience most certainly is not clear, and if it is, then it explains why you cheered harming young girls with vaccines.
I haven't been wrong that much.
You were wrong on four counts on the Kim Potter case alone, and a fifth one is coming.
Remember when I claimed the Pope was a feminist puppet and he pushed birth rates and vaxxes in one week?
I guess you can 'prove' anything if you assert that 'breathing' is 'BEING A FEMINIST PUPPET'.
It's not my claim. It was a popular conspiracy theory at the time that was silenced by social media.
Wow, I guess it's not just the truth that they silence, but also total and complete BS... in some cases at least.
The fact that this ridiculous story is still being talked about. We/they (What do you put when you're formerly from somewhere?) didn't have enquiries when social services were ignoring calls about abuse of adopted boys by lesbian couples. They didn't have enquiries about how the male suicide rate rocketed up under May. They didn't have enquiries about myocarditis. They didn't have enquires about all the men killed by women since Coercive Control.
Sarah Everard can burn in hell, if she even existed and isn't just a ploy to root out people in the police who are "misogynist" in preparation for something evil down the line.
thispersondoesnotexist.com
So now you're attacking an innocent woman who as murdered because you don't like how she is used by rabid ideologues? That is low even by your standards.
Often wrong but never in doubt. How many incorrect predictions will it take you to change your worldview? A trillion?
This is the craziest thing you've claimed so far.
My conscience is clear. Her contribution to this world (if she existed) is producing yet more reasons for women in the UK to get violent. How many innocent people will be harmed as a direct result of policy brought in after this because "women can't trust police to defend them"?
I haven't been wrong that much. It's just that you remember when I'm wrong more often than when I'm right. Remember when I claimed the Pope was a feminist puppet and he pushed birth rates and vaxxes in one week?
It's not my claim. It was a popular conspiracy theory at the time that was silenced by social media. The theory stated that Everard never existed, and was simply a ploy by Carrie Symonds to ensure the government review into adding "misogyny" to the Prevent program, among other measures, could be justified. I even posted the government review's status, where it showed that a week after her death was announced was the date for a decision to be made. (The decision was to merge it with the Online Harms Bill pushed after the Euro 2020 racist tweet debacle.)
You see, normal, sane people blame people only for something for which they are to blame. She is not to blame for being murdered by a psycho like you. If you want to be mad, be mad at the guy who murdered her - but that would defeat your raison d'etre of blaming women for everything. Now even a murder victim is to blame for your pathetic, sad, pitiful victim complex.
In the context where the vast majority of murders and assaults are commited by men against women, by the way.
Your conscience most certainly is not clear, and if it is, then it explains why you cheered harming young girls with vaccines.
You were wrong on four counts on the Kim Potter case alone, and a fifth one is coming.
I guess you can 'prove' anything if you assert that 'breathing' is 'BEING A FEMINIST PUPPET'.
Wow, I guess it's not just the truth that they silence, but also total and complete BS... in some cases at least.
I'm completely non-violent. At least until they get violent with me, which hasn't happened yet.
I was wrong on that, but how many times have you been wrong?
So, pushing birth rates isn't what their puppets do? They don't want men trapped in relationships for maximum resource extraction?
It's not BS. The policy feminism wanted was up for review a week after she died. It was a fraud.