Did you see something from the Church specifically on the MRNa forbidding it? I ask because I saw something to the opposite explaining why it was okay, even if the original cells came from an aborted fetus, which from what I read, they're not sure did. The original cells came from a Scandanavian fetus who died in the early 70's. All cells used are regrown from those original ones. I couldn't believe the Church was supporting the shot, but after reading their position, I could understand.
What I've seen is a document recently suggesting that if the alternative is killing an innocent in your own family, that partaking in such a morally compromised treatment is a potential option, but one that must always be a careful consideration. Doing so out of a desire to conform to social pressure or to preserve your own life would still inarguably be a grave sin.
And in this missive they quoted and restated the Dignitas Personae.
Did you see something from the Church specifically on the MRNa forbidding it? I ask because I saw something to the opposite explaining why it was okay, even if the original cells came from an aborted fetus, which from what I read, they're not sure did. The original cells came from a Scandanavian fetus who died in the early 70's. All cells used are regrown from those original ones. I couldn't believe the Church was supporting the shot, but after reading their position, I could understand.
What I've seen is a document recently suggesting that if the alternative is killing an innocent in your own family, that partaking in such a morally compromised treatment is a potential option, but one that must always be a careful consideration. Doing so out of a desire to conform to social pressure or to preserve your own life would still inarguably be a grave sin.
And in this missive they quoted and restated the Dignitas Personae.