^ Mind the screams. "Dan Andrews, that's on your fuckin' hand, you dog."
This was inevitable.
When tyranny and oppression becomes so unbearably stifling to a population (and protest, speech, and government choice are no longer an option) they will begin to lash out.
This is one of the many ways they may chose to do that, regardless of legal implications.
The Australian government has made it repeatedly clear that the lives of less than fully vaccinated people who have failed to properly register are enemies of the state and it's glorious revolution. They are to be savagely punished until they comply or die. This person, unsurprisingly, chose death. This includes the Internment Camps that I have heard idiot Australians attempting to defend. This includes significant amounts of police violence and harassment. This includes personal violence and harassment. This includes the removal of all available economic activity.
This man, correctly, understood that the law serves no purpose in Australia. The state has made a friend-enemy distinction between it's loyalists and dissenters. As Cicero notes, the law falls silent in times of war. As Clausewitz notes, this is because the law does not apply to your enemy, because the law is a moral force, and they are outside of your moral framework. This is why the statement: "They want you broke, they want you homeless, they want your wife dead, your children raped, and they think it's funny." rings so true. That is how you treat a sworn enemy who is outside your moral framework. The Australian state is at war with it's people, and that is why the law fell silent, and that is why this man chose death.
He will not be the last.
To the slaves and the villeins of petty tyrants: this is your fault. In fact, this is what you wanted. You may celebrate his death at your earliest convenience, you may even write a song about it and post it to TikTok. But please spare the rest of us your lecture about how good of a person you are. You are abominable creatures who have chosen, at every opportunity, an illusion of safety for the real sacrifice of Liberty. You did this under the guise of safety, but your only true reason was the opportunity to exert power over others. Unfortunately for you, this will continue to get worse: that is also your fault.
Yes, you are the baddies.
If you haven't figured that out from the smell of burning flesh yet, then I don't know what else to tell you.
Fine.
I want that mask off permanently.
I want to see those pearly whites, and I want others to see them to.
The mask has been off for a while now. Didn't you see the Oedipal President Macron with his little speech?
I still wonder why Australia and not NZ. Or maybe Australia is resisting more than NZ and that's why it seems worse.
Is the reason for Australia being the test run because there's absolutely no feasible way to leave without government help?
Does Australia have significance to the enemy?
New Zealand isn't resisting at all. The Fascist PM there was expected to win, and she did, but she still seemed to cheat and also ordered the election to be delayed. "Kiwis" are telling me that she's fairly popular, and people there are saying she's bringing a lot of credibility to New Zealand. They enjoy their fascism. I'd kick them from the 5 EYES at this point.
Australia has significance to China, so yeah. China is currently going up against Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, and India. Almost none of those places are prepared to tolerate Chinese subversion if they can avoid it, for any number of reasons (including Cultural, Historical, Political, Regional, Fiscal, Ethnic, and Religious contrasts). Australia, being part of the Fabian Socialist West, is the easiest to subvert with the least effort and infiltration. Securing labor, industry, and resources from Australia is actually very important (it's historically one of the reasons Japan considered invading).
The Fabains themselves are deeply invested in China so they stand to profit heavily from China's rise and are doing precious little to stop them. The US not being an active partner in the pacific will make South Korea, Indonesia, and Philippines significantly undermined. Indonesia and Philippines also have significant natural resources to exploit. Problem with Indonesia is that it is literally the largest Muslim country in the world, and they'll be a much harder nut to crack than Australia or Philippines. This is why the Uyghurs have to be genocided, the Muslims don't come quietly with the Communists.
Australia is a test run for the Fabians just because they are (as you've noticed) the most authoritarian-tolerant of the Anglosphere. More heavy handed measures are needed in AU, where the England and US require more subversion.
Of course she won. If she didn't win, there'd be 400 investigations because women aren't allowed to lose elections. I also know people from there. They are utterly deluded, to a point that I think they're mentally broken.
Is China really the end boss? I don't believe that. You know my opinion, of course, that this is the culmination of literal decades of our feminist friends seizing power, blackmailing people and bribing others. The problem with the idea of it being Chinese domination is that if the whole world's governments were really led by the Chinese, why are we still all talking about Taiwan? It wouldn't surprise me if they were causing division for the sake of showing their people how CCP rule is better than Western "decadence", but the idea that they've taken over already? And why would they do it like this when Belt and Road was working perfectly well for extracting resources?
It's also extremely weird that both Taiwan and Ukraine were completely silent and uneventful for the three weeks that the NDAA included a draft for women. Answers for that one on the back of a postcard.
China's not the end-boss. There is no real "end-boss" because all of the biggest bosses have their own separate agendas. The Fabians and the CCP are tied together, but (like all Leftists) they are not perfect allies. They still want to screw each other over. China is just a major player in Australia's affairs. Thier global strategic initiative in the Pacific and Africa are also something to keep an eye on.
I'm not saying that, it's not that simple. China is one major player. They have limits on what they can do. The Fabians are another major player, and they have limits on what they can do.
Huh? Taiwan and Ukraine are both in a bit of a shitstorm right now due to a lack of American interest. They are scrambling to find allies. Taiwan is finding them in Japan, SK, and Vietnam. Ukraine... well, they might not exist here in a few months. They're not finding allies generally.
That's everywhere but the US, surely. Maybe Mexico if they piss off the cartel too much.