It's a woman bragging about forcing unwanted substances into men's bodies.
Everyone's. Even though you had bet $10 that women would be exempted, turns out it wudn't.
They want to control... everyone.
I said the first companies to fire the unjabbed would be feminist true believers from my list.
I see no mention of Citigroup in your list.
With Citigroup being the first to do it
The first? Really?
At least we'll get to take their spaces before we die of myocarditis. Maybe.
So your prediction is that 80% of 1/3000 of young men who took the vaccine will die of myocaridties within 5 years?
I find it interesting that you have switched twice now on whether the vaccines are "INTENDED TO MURDER US!!!!!!!!!!" A while back, you said that it wouldn't because it would only kill those who "trust them" (as if anyone but you makes a connection between the vaccine and females of the opposite sex).
It's all from things I've posted with reputable sourcing
Eh... one thing I have learned is that there is no such thing.
I don't believe they'll let it go.
Certainly not voluntarily. As a way to control people, this beats anything you can come up with.
They didn't need to be exempted. It doesn't affect them, that was why it was approved by the feminist led FDA and promoted by the feminist led CDC.
Yes, I can't find the comment, I included them in the comment alongside P&G and the rest of that list. I need to update that list with the enemies I find blindingly obvious because I think others don't follow so closely.
Except every booster doubles the myocarditis rate. I have the PDF file showing this. So, assuming three jabs a year and the initial rate of 1 per 10,000 (it's around 1.78) for ease of calculation, that's :
80% of 1 in 2,500 after the current full booster cycle.
80% of 1 in 312.5 after two years, which I will round to 1 in 300 for ease of the next calculation.
They didn't need to be exempted. It doesn't affect them,
Are you even serious? Your own graphs that you kept obsessively posting to prove that the vaccine is a MURDER WEAPON also showed very high rates of myocarditis for women.
that was why it was approved by the feminist led FDA and promoted by the feminist led CDC.
lol
I need to update that list with the enemies I find blindingly obvious because I think others don't follow so closely.
If you leave out some of the weaker ones, that will make your list better.
Except every booster doubles the myocarditis rate. I have the PDF file showing this. So, assuming three jabs a year and the initial rate of 1 per 10,000 (it's around 1.78) for ease of calculation, that's :
That 1 in 37.5 is extremely unlikely. But assuming that it is correct, what do you think will happen if 3% of young men die, due to recommendations by governments and 'health' authorities? There will be a revolution. Guillotines, firing squads, lynchings of the ruling class.
And that won't be you doing it - it will be the 'feminist' you hate because they killed her precious Johnny.
Well, we'll see in five years who is right. Will they be dropping like flies with us or will they be still posting #KillAllMen like normal?
Both of those things are true. The CDC's Director spent the last 4 years whining about glass ceilings in medical science before magically getting the job from the senile one's puppet admin.
Maybe. I'm trying to find a balance between my obscenely long personal list and something that could actually be used by others.
It's based off the data we have on the jabs. The rate of doubling could lower after a certain number, but as it stands, the risk doubles after every jab.
What do I think will happen? I think they'll double down, start blaming the Chinese and push for WW3. If you think they'll actually allow the truth to get out and not just claim "new variant", especially as it's 3% after 5 years, which gives them a lot of time to plan a cover up. It's clever, each year sets a new timer for a slightly larger group of their enemy to die. Then they have around five years to set the narrative.
Why in 5 years? I'm pretty sure you will have left by then, and if not, this will have been forgotten. I don't see you keeping up this intensity for five whole years. Surely, you can make a prediction that is not that far off.
Will they be dropping like flies with us
No one's going to be dropping like flies. You're also ignoring the Canadian link that you yourself sent me, which also showed very high myocarditis rates for women, though somewhat lower. If you actually believe that 3% of men are going to die in 7 years, then 2% of women are going to die.
The CDC's Director spent the last 4 years whining about glass ceilings in medical science
It's also irrelevant, as anyone else would have approved this vaccine as well.
It's based off the data we have on the jabs. The rate of doubling could lower after a certain number, but as it stands, the risk doubles after every jab.
I mean if this is true. You're here assuming that governments are going to push three vaccines a year after the first two, even for groups that are not at risk, and that these people who are not at risk are going to say "thank you, Sir, may I have another one?"
That simply isn't going to happen. But if it did, it would result in the overthrow of the current order.
What do I think will happen? I think they'll double down, start blaming the Chinese and push for WW3.
Blame the Chinese for what? If millions start dying of heart problems, how exactly are they going to blame that on the Chinese? They could conceivably blame it on health damage during lockdowns, but even that would be far-fetched.
If you think they'll actually allow the truth to get out
Like the truth got out about their "murder weapon", the AstraZeneca vaccine? Or the Moderna vaccine for under 30? These had infinitesimal risks, at least the ones that are known, and yet they were withdrawn.
But you think they're going to cover up millions of young, healthy men dropping dead? Not even in North Korea could you do that. In Nazi Germany, families of mentally handicapped people who had been murdered discovered their murders because the 'cause of death' was suspiciously alike in every case.
It's clever, each year sets a new timer for a slightly larger group of their enemy to die.
And I presume that the many men in the medical establishment are either in on it, or they're being deceived?
Everyone's. Even though you had bet $10 that women would be exempted, turns out it wudn't.
They want to control... everyone.
I see no mention of Citigroup in your list.
The first? Really?
So your prediction is that 80% of 1/3000 of young men who took the vaccine will die of myocaridties within 5 years?
I find it interesting that you have switched twice now on whether the vaccines are "INTENDED TO MURDER US!!!!!!!!!!" A while back, you said that it wouldn't because it would only kill those who "trust them" (as if anyone but you makes a connection between the vaccine and females of the opposite sex).
Eh... one thing I have learned is that there is no such thing.
Certainly not voluntarily. As a way to control people, this beats anything you can come up with.
They didn't need to be exempted. It doesn't affect them, that was why it was approved by the feminist led FDA and promoted by the feminist led CDC.
Yes, I can't find the comment, I included them in the comment alongside P&G and the rest of that list. I need to update that list with the enemies I find blindingly obvious because I think others don't follow so closely.
Except every booster doubles the myocarditis rate. I have the PDF file showing this. So, assuming three jabs a year and the initial rate of 1 per 10,000 (it's around 1.78) for ease of calculation, that's :
80% of 1 in 2,500 after the current full booster cycle.
80% of 1 in 312.5 after two years, which I will round to 1 in 300 for ease of the next calculation.
80% of 1 in 37.5 after three years.
Are you even serious? Your own graphs that you kept obsessively posting to prove that the vaccine is a MURDER WEAPON also showed very high rates of myocarditis for women.
lol
If you leave out some of the weaker ones, that will make your list better.
That 1 in 37.5 is extremely unlikely. But assuming that it is correct, what do you think will happen if 3% of young men die, due to recommendations by governments and 'health' authorities? There will be a revolution. Guillotines, firing squads, lynchings of the ruling class.
And that won't be you doing it - it will be the 'feminist' you hate because they killed her precious Johnny.
Well, we'll see in five years who is right. Will they be dropping like flies with us or will they be still posting #KillAllMen like normal?
Both of those things are true. The CDC's Director spent the last 4 years whining about glass ceilings in medical science before magically getting the job from the senile one's puppet admin.
Maybe. I'm trying to find a balance between my obscenely long personal list and something that could actually be used by others.
It's based off the data we have on the jabs. The rate of doubling could lower after a certain number, but as it stands, the risk doubles after every jab.
What do I think will happen? I think they'll double down, start blaming the Chinese and push for WW3. If you think they'll actually allow the truth to get out and not just claim "new variant", especially as it's 3% after 5 years, which gives them a lot of time to plan a cover up. It's clever, each year sets a new timer for a slightly larger group of their enemy to die. Then they have around five years to set the narrative.
Why in 5 years? I'm pretty sure you will have left by then, and if not, this will have been forgotten. I don't see you keeping up this intensity for five whole years. Surely, you can make a prediction that is not that far off.
No one's going to be dropping like flies. You're also ignoring the Canadian link that you yourself sent me, which also showed very high myocarditis rates for women, though somewhat lower. If you actually believe that 3% of men are going to die in 7 years, then 2% of women are going to die.
It's also irrelevant, as anyone else would have approved this vaccine as well.
I mean if this is true. You're here assuming that governments are going to push three vaccines a year after the first two, even for groups that are not at risk, and that these people who are not at risk are going to say "thank you, Sir, may I have another one?"
That simply isn't going to happen. But if it did, it would result in the overthrow of the current order.
Blame the Chinese for what? If millions start dying of heart problems, how exactly are they going to blame that on the Chinese? They could conceivably blame it on health damage during lockdowns, but even that would be far-fetched.
Like the truth got out about their "murder weapon", the AstraZeneca vaccine? Or the Moderna vaccine for under 30? These had infinitesimal risks, at least the ones that are known, and yet they were withdrawn.
But you think they're going to cover up millions of young, healthy men dropping dead? Not even in North Korea could you do that. In Nazi Germany, families of mentally handicapped people who had been murdered discovered their murders because the 'cause of death' was suspiciously alike in every case.
And I presume that the many men in the medical establishment are either in on it, or they're being deceived?