I can't believe they used the "right side of history" defense in a court of law, and it worked.
The only correct response from the judge would be something like, "If you are offended by a statue or anything else, there are proper legal channels to seek change. You go not get to decide which statues should be removed and which should remain."
Clown world doesn't even begin to describe what we're witnessing.
I can't believe they used the "right side of history" defense in a court of law, and it worked.
The only correct response from the judge would be something like, "If you are offended by a statue or anything else, there are proper legal channels to seek change. You go not get to decide which statues should be removed and which should remain."
Clown world doesn't even begin to describe what we're witnessing.