I think he got banned for this comment in his thread:
I disagree. I think harming others is their main priority. If they cared how they were perceived, they wouldn't be calling for mass murder.
You're kind of close here. They join causes that are popular, yes. But they do that to exploit those causes to advance feminism.
Sadistic, inexcusable and attacking babies. I'm surprised they don't already do it.
On the one hand I see the point that painting others as "the group that's trying to kill you" is a problem.
On the other hand, I just ran across another feminist saying basically the same thing about men who didn't match their sexual preferences today, so is it stopping hate groups or is protecting the main hate group from competition?
He was rightfully banned for violating Rule 16: "Do not attack entire identity groups as inferior or conspiring."
As a PSA, here are some simple examples (to the best of my understanding):
Not a violation (clearly hyperbolic jest): "Mods are dickless fags who will ban anyone questioning feminist orthodoxy"
A clear violation (and also a fact): "Women as an entire group have lower representation in high IQ percentiles than Men"
The More You Know 🌠
I think he got banned for this comment in his thread:
On the one hand I see the point that painting others as "the group that's trying to kill you" is a problem.
On the other hand, I just ran across another feminist saying basically the same thing about men who didn't match their sexual preferences today, so is it stopping hate groups or is protecting the main hate group from competition?