The NYT tries to spin this as being about its 'climate catastrophe'. But all of the article seems to be about legitimate conservation issues and the damage done by lithium mining to create batteries.
Also, check out this rank propaganda:
The climate consequences of losing Build Back Better. Without the legislation’s climate provisions, the United States appears very unlikely to hit President Biden’s targets for greenhouse gas reductions.
The NYT tries to spin this as being about its 'climate catastrophe'. But all of the article seems to be about legitimate conservation issues and the damage done by lithium mining to create batteries.
Also, check out this rank propaganda:
Besides power, they only actually care about appearances.