I want to know how many they were planning to kill.
So they failed at this just like they failed at everything else?
Here's the CDC admitting the second dose is more likely to harm.
Are they covering everything up, in which case you should not be putting your trust in what the CDC says, or are they not, in which case you can cite it as a source? Pick one.
Well, they haven't yet got the mandates in place and we're only on the third shot of God only knows how many. It's not as much a failure as a work in progress. I'm curious why they hate Israel so much though, that they have to be first to get the extra shots.
There's different stages of covering up. You can say something didn't happen, you can say it did but it's nothing to worry about or you can say it happened but it was an accident. They chose the second one, tell the truth but with a heavy emphasis on downplaying it and get friendly media to help.
The truth is, there's no such thing as "mild" myocarditis. The heart never heals if you damage it.
So what is the goal? How many deaths? Ballpark figure.
The truth is, there's no such thing as "mild" myocarditis. The heart never heals if you damage it.
Can you link to an objective source that isn't partisan, supporting this claim? I simply don't know this. As far as I know, myocarditis is inflammation, not 'damage' per se. On the other hand, I don't know its long-term effects.
I mean, the famous phrase is 90% of us, which would be 3.15bn. I don't think that would go unnoticed, even inching up over time like they appear to be doing, so maybe it's a number of some significance to them? We'll only know the target has been reached when they stop boosting.
I posted it a few times, but I can't find it. Title of the post was something like "we're being given a feminist death sentence" and linked to a pre-pandemic paper on myocarditis that detailed how 80% of those who get it don't live more than 5 years.
I want to know how many they were planning to kill.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/myocarditis.html
Here's the CDC admitting the second dose is more likely to harm.
So what about the third? The fourth?
Was the idea to depopulate us slowly by ramping up the incidence with constant boosters?
So they failed at this just like they failed at everything else?
Are they covering everything up, in which case you should not be putting your trust in what the CDC says, or are they not, in which case you can cite it as a source? Pick one.
Well, they haven't yet got the mandates in place and we're only on the third shot of God only knows how many. It's not as much a failure as a work in progress. I'm curious why they hate Israel so much though, that they have to be first to get the extra shots.
There's different stages of covering up. You can say something didn't happen, you can say it did but it's nothing to worry about or you can say it happened but it was an accident. They chose the second one, tell the truth but with a heavy emphasis on downplaying it and get friendly media to help.
The truth is, there's no such thing as "mild" myocarditis. The heart never heals if you damage it.
So what is the goal? How many deaths? Ballpark figure.
Can you link to an objective source that isn't partisan, supporting this claim? I simply don't know this. As far as I know, myocarditis is inflammation, not 'damage' per se. On the other hand, I don't know its long-term effects.
I mean, the famous phrase is 90% of us, which would be 3.15bn. I don't think that would go unnoticed, even inching up over time like they appear to be doing, so maybe it's a number of some significance to them? We'll only know the target has been reached when they stop boosting.
I posted it a few times, but I can't find it. Title of the post was something like "we're being given a feminist death sentence" and linked to a pre-pandemic paper on myocarditis that detailed how 80% of those who get it don't live more than 5 years.