You made the claim. You made it with confidence, like everything else, and then it turns out that you have absolutely no basis whatsoever for making that claim?
So in short: you provided nothing showing that this is a 'feminist cult', that Park had 'feminist policies', or that these policies were dictated by this cult.
As they say: often wrong, but never in doubt.
You realize that this happened before I started archiving everything I ever talked about?
There has been times where I pulled claims that other groups blindly followed, because I looked into them and found them incorrect.
What ways? Archives have a 5 character tag, for example, the one I just posted to MGTOW is https://archive.ph/JA1wN - obviously, that would be impossible to find without having the link somewhere already or having the URL of the original page.
I use Office 365 for nearly all my non-wrongthink activities.
There has been times where I pulled claims that other groups blindly followed, because I looked into them and found them incorrect.
Yes, I remember those cases. But I also remember why you looked into them. You do have a bit of a blind spot when it comes to accepting stuff that confirms your prejudices.
obviously, that would be impossible to find without having the link somewhere already or having the URL of the original page.
Google indexes them. And the archiving sites allow wildcards. But yes, it's not perfect, which is why I do keep track of all my archives - at the moment, I have about 40,000 URLs.
You made the claim. You made it with confidence, like everything else, and then it turns out that you have absolutely no basis whatsoever for making that claim?
So in short: you provided nothing showing that this is a 'feminist cult', that Park had 'feminist policies', or that these policies were dictated by this cult.
As they say: often wrong, but never in doubt.
You are the only one who archives stuff, yes.
Except I do have evidence. I just can't find it.
What I mean is how do you expect me to find an archive I didn't create?
I don't have an Excel sheet full of links to relate to everything I saw.
I have my doubts that you subjected that 'evidence' to the amount of scrutiny that it merited, since it confirmed your prejudices.
There are ways.
What kind of amateur would use Excel? I have an actual SQLite database.
There has been times where I pulled claims that other groups blindly followed, because I looked into them and found them incorrect.
What ways? Archives have a 5 character tag, for example, the one I just posted to MGTOW is https://archive.ph/JA1wN - obviously, that would be impossible to find without having the link somewhere already or having the URL of the original page.
I use Office 365 for nearly all my non-wrongthink activities.
Yes, I remember those cases. But I also remember why you looked into them. You do have a bit of a blind spot when it comes to accepting stuff that confirms your prejudices.
Google indexes them. And the archiving sites allow wildcards. But yes, it's not perfect, which is why I do keep track of all my archives - at the moment, I have about 40,000 URLs.