BBC cheering and encouraging ideological censorship of wikipedia
(www.bbc.co.uk)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (51)
sorted by:
Stop fueling Deluezian territorialization. You need to let go of these liberal myths such as rational debate forming the basis of societal organization. The midwit vehemently defends leftist positions because he recognizes that adopting the state religion will help him advance. Political formulas are a post-hoc rationalization for establishing the right to rule. If literally Hitler took over tomorrow, the progressive midwits would instantly claim they were always national socialists, much like the many people that loyally served the Third Republic, the Vichy regime, and the de Gaulle regime without an ounce of cognitive dissonance. The only thing that matter is removing the entire governing managerial class from power and smashing their infrastructure.
Read some Mosca, Pareto, Bernays, Lippmann, de Jouvenel, Burnham, and Sam Francis.
If facts and logic could stop the poz, Thomas Sowell would have done it single-handedly 50 years ago. Yet, the west has only accelerated away from reality towards insanity. Where is your evidence that rational debate has ever been a driving force of policy? Technic advancement isn't politics, and there is no such thing as scientific governance. If you haven't noticed, Science™ can't even figure out what genders are anymore because governing elites have dictated it as such.
Spez; Moldbug's Cathedral is good starting point for understanding how western government functions, but you should really pickup Mosca, Pareto, de Jouvenel, and Sam Francis for an more in-depth analysis. Bernays and Lippmann give a wonderful breakdown of how the "invisible controllers" of public opinion engineer consent.
Your clear aversion to reading explains your ignorance of Sowell.