Go ahead, warmistas, explain how much, if any, the computer models you cultists are relying on to prove your hypothesis account for more than a tiny sliver of solar output.
I'll save you the trouble, they don't.
If they did, you would have to dial CO2 sensitivity way back, because that is the only way you would be able to account for the known temperature record.
I won't even get into how NOAA/NASA have to alter the historical temperature record to match the hypothesis.
Warmistas are all frauds, chasing Federal grant dollars at the expense of everything else. They are the geocentric establishment, trying to suppress Galileo and his theories.
Go ahead, warmistas, explain how much, if any, the computer models you cultists are relying on to prove your hypothesis account for more than a tiny sliver of solar output.
I'll save you the trouble, they don't.
If they did, you would have to dial CO2 sensitivity way back, because that is the only way you would be able to account for the known temperature record.
I won't even get into how NOAA/NASA have to alter the historical temperature record to match the hypothesis.
Warmistas are all frauds, chasing Federal grant dollars at the expense of everything else. They are the geocentric establishment, trying to suppress Galileo and his theories.