So, as you know from my post a long time ago where I talked about my conflicting emotions around owning even a small number of PFE shares, it's not a good show of character, in my opinion, to be invested in it still.
Especially if your entire career revolved around opposing them. It'd be like if I owned stock in every company on my boycott list.
So, as you know from my post a long time ago where I talked about my conflicting emotions around owning even a small number of PFE shares, it's not a good show of character
That's just your opinion. It doesn't make anyone a 'grifter'. You're just looking for a reason to say MTG bad, and I think I know why...
Especially if your entire career revolved around opposing them. It'd be like if I owned stock in every company on my boycott list.
I have no qualms about owning any sort of stock, since it does those companies no good at all for me rather than someone else to own the stock.
I'd have to have planned this out a long time then, I made that post months ago. Myocarditis was first reported in April 21.
Yeah, back then you were panicking about AstraZeneca (and a curfew for men), which you are conveniently not mentioning here. You also said that AZ was 'created by women to kill men', and claimed that women would be exempted from taking it.
But for some reason, their evil plan was foiled. Drats! Ursula von der Leyen did not ask the ECB to force every country to use AstraZeneca.
That's true, but making profit off your enemy's success makes you a traitor, surely.
Not particularly. Nor is Pfizer my enemy, any more than any other big company. They're pretty much all evil.
I was right that there was a vaccine created by women which harmed men more. I just bet on the wrong name. I knew when all our enemies praised something, it was a bad thing.
As you may recall, I pivoted from AZ to PFE when myocarditis was beginning to come out.
From there I settled on the CDC Director as being the reason, but the PV expose came out and inadvertently showed how many of the upper ranks at PFE are feminists. From there I found the lead scientist was a dangerhair and it all made sense.
Well, that's a weird moral stance. Profiting from your enemy winning means that you are on their side, you want them to succeed.
So, as you know from my post a long time ago where I talked about my conflicting emotions around owning even a small number of PFE shares, it's not a good show of character, in my opinion, to be invested in it still.
Especially if your entire career revolved around opposing them. It'd be like if I owned stock in every company on my boycott list.
That's just your opinion. It doesn't make anyone a 'grifter'. You're just looking for a reason to say MTG bad, and I think I know why...
I have no qualms about owning any sort of stock, since it does those companies no good at all for me rather than someone else to own the stock.
I'd have to have planned this out a long time then, I made that post months ago. Myocarditis was first reported in April 21.
That's true, but making profit off your enemy's success makes you a traitor, surely.
If I was going to war with China, I wouldn't own Tencent shares.
Yeah, back then you were panicking about AstraZeneca (and a curfew for men), which you are conveniently not mentioning here. You also said that AZ was 'created by women to kill men', and claimed that women would be exempted from taking it.
But for some reason, their evil plan was foiled. Drats! Ursula von der Leyen did not ask the ECB to force every country to use AstraZeneca.
Not particularly. Nor is Pfizer my enemy, any more than any other big company. They're pretty much all evil.
I was right that there was a vaccine created by women which harmed men more. I just bet on the wrong name. I knew when all our enemies praised something, it was a bad thing.
As you may recall, I pivoted from AZ to PFE when myocarditis was beginning to come out.
From there I settled on the CDC Director as being the reason, but the PV expose came out and inadvertently showed how many of the upper ranks at PFE are feminists. From there I found the lead scientist was a dangerhair and it all made sense.
Well, that's a weird moral stance. Profiting from your enemy winning means that you are on their side, you want them to succeed.