There are a lot assumptions in there such as that the tests are accurate, but the most common tests such as PCR are entirely worthless.
Are they?
The leakiness of a proper vaccine is negligible and will stop the spread.
How leaky is a vaccine vs. the variant it was actually developed for? Not very, right?
Herd immunity applies equally to a real vaccine and natural immunity.
But people with natural immunity can get infected as well. Not clear if it's way better or somewhat worse than the vaccine. So by your standard, if you analogize the two, you're accepting it as a real vaccine.
But people with natural immunity can get infected as well. Not clear if it's way better or somewhat worse than the vaccine. So by your standard, if you analogize the two, you're accepting it as a real vaccine.
I can't find it now, because it's inconvenient to the powers that be, but the CDC admitted in response to a FOIA that they haven't been able to confirm a single case of reinfection. That's a myth like the asymptomatic spread, which started from a Chinese lady in Europe that was pharmacologically suppressing her symptoms.
You're desperately clinging to the regime's null hypothesises for some weird reason. Sovereign is he who sets the null hypothesis.
I can't find it now, because it's inconvenient to the powers that be, but the CDC admitted in response to a FOIA that they haven't been able to confirm a single case of reinfection.
I believe there have been many cases of re-infection with Omicron, but I can't vouch for it.
You're desperately clinging to the regime's null hypothesises for some weird reason. Sovereign is he who sets the null hypothesis.
That is no doubt true, but not everything is a conspiracy. It's perfectly possible to acknowledge that the vaccines can be good for some, while supporting people's freedom to refuse them.
Furthermore, regardless of the truth of it, if you start saying this sort of thing to people, the odds of persuading them to a more reasonable position is zero. But I have persuaded many to oppose vaccine mandates and passports and crap like that with my more reasonable position.
Are they?
How leaky is a vaccine vs. the variant it was actually developed for? Not very, right?
But people with natural immunity can get infected as well. Not clear if it's way better or somewhat worse than the vaccine. So by your standard, if you analogize the two, you're accepting it as a real vaccine.
Yes
I can't find it now, because it's inconvenient to the powers that be, but the CDC admitted in response to a FOIA that they haven't been able to confirm a single case of reinfection. That's a myth like the asymptomatic spread, which started from a Chinese lady in Europe that was pharmacologically suppressing her symptoms.
You're desperately clinging to the regime's null hypothesises for some weird reason. Sovereign is he who sets the null hypothesis.
I doubt it.
I believe there have been many cases of re-infection with Omicron, but I can't vouch for it.
That is no doubt true, but not everything is a conspiracy. It's perfectly possible to acknowledge that the vaccines can be good for some, while supporting people's freedom to refuse them.
Furthermore, regardless of the truth of it, if you start saying this sort of thing to people, the odds of persuading them to a more reasonable position is zero. But I have persuaded many to oppose vaccine mandates and passports and crap like that with my more reasonable position.
I never open with my real positions when discussing this stuff with normies.
Ah. Well, I've always known you as a smart guy, hereby once again confirmed.