I bet I can get DoM to come deal with the moderation queue with this comment.
Imagine an alternative world to ours, where Covid came from an all-jew lab, the vaccines were created by jews and seemed to only kill goyim, where world leaders talked about a destruction of amalek.
People who considered goiym cattle ran the hospitals and social media platforms, silencing all concerns and pushing the vax as hard as they could.
Any stories about goyim dying were instantly prefaced with "this is very rare and shouldn't be a concern" by the institutions controlled by jews as the conversation built towards mandatory vaccination, led by jews who weren't even elected, but installed into power.
Would there still be the uncaring tone towards anyone who questioned the official narrative? Or would we see the whole world stop to demand to know what's going on?
So here's the thing. Imp1 was careful to just go with "people". Where the two of you differ is:
People who considered women evil
No one specified. In fact, the best way to describe this inference is that the people who considered women evil: hardline incels? That's not any sort of race, ethnicity, religion, or any such characteristic. Those are ideologues.
People who considered goiym cattle
In this one, you got the whole comparison backwards. If we are to make interchange incels with whites, and women with jews, then your statement should be: "People who considered jews evil"
So, your interchange is actually backwards.
The whole goyim thing, however, confers an assumption of hostility based on the eternal race war narrative. With "goyim" you're already asserting jewish racial-supremacism from the perspective of the white racialist anti-jews. You're not asserting it from Zionism, nor are you asserting it from Feminism like Imp1 is, you're not even asserting it from jewish religious supremacism. That would be the problem with that statement.
You've actually re-written the statement to violate rule 16, instead of just interchanging the groups properly. Had you done that, it wouldn't inherently violate Rule 16.
Not that your comment does since it's done with such pure disingenuous cynicism that it can't actually violate the spirit of the rule. I have to make an exception to this, explicitly because you don't mean it and are just trying to get my attention.
I should probably expand on my goal here: The bot Fuckthedems needs to be banned, and DoM won't come on here unless Jester or Antonio ask him to ban someone. By doing a little word substitution I'v pretty much guaranteed jester is gonna be a turbosperg, and go whining to AoV. Antonio will then log onto/contact DoM, who will then go through the mod queue, hopefully removing the bots, and probably also removing our posts.
It's a bot, that's reason enough for it to be banned. Anyways it's spamming leftypol crap, which is also reason enough for it to be banned. And if you think leftypol is my side, you couldn't be more mistaken.
I bet I can get DoM to come deal with the moderation queue with this comment.
Huh, looks like it violates R16.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
So here's the thing. Imp1 was careful to just go with "people". Where the two of you differ is:
No one specified. In fact, the best way to describe this inference is that the people who considered women evil: hardline incels? That's not any sort of race, ethnicity, religion, or any such characteristic. Those are ideologues.
In this one, you got the whole comparison backwards. If we are to make interchange incels with whites, and women with jews, then your statement should be: "People who considered jews evil"
So, your interchange is actually backwards.
The whole goyim thing, however, confers an assumption of hostility based on the eternal race war narrative. With "goyim" you're already asserting jewish racial-supremacism from the perspective of the white racialist anti-jews. You're not asserting it from Zionism, nor are you asserting it from Feminism like Imp1 is, you're not even asserting it from jewish religious supremacism. That would be the problem with that statement.
You've actually re-written the statement to violate rule 16, instead of just interchanging the groups properly. Had you done that, it wouldn't inherently violate Rule 16.
Not that your comment does since it's done with such pure disingenuous cynicism that it can't actually violate the spirit of the rule. I have to make an exception to this, explicitly because you don't mean it and are just trying to get my attention.
I should probably expand on my goal here: The bot Fuckthedems needs to be banned, and DoM won't come on here unless Jester or Antonio ask him to ban someone. By doing a little word substitution I'v pretty much guaranteed jester is gonna be a turbosperg, and go whining to AoV. Antonio will then log onto/contact DoM, who will then go through the mod queue, hopefully removing the bots, and probably also removing our posts.
You know I have a real life, right? You think it might have something to do with that?
I'm sorry if I missed some bots in the last few days, but if you want to contact me through some other mechanism, I'll see what I can set up.
It's a bot, that's reason enough for it to be banned. Anyways it's spamming leftypol crap, which is also reason enough for it to be banned. And if you think leftypol is my side, you couldn't be more mistaken.
It's not like it will stick, you just got a 24 day ban 2 days ago.
He removed the comment. It's open to everyone if they adjust their comment. Most of them just refuse. Typically out of principle.