Is an empirical question, which cannot be deduced from logic or biology.
China and India don't count
Murica, not China or India.
You did, and that's why you still consider them people. Nobody who used to be a feminist will ever admit that they are sadistic psychopaths who should be locked in a padded room.
How many people who weren't will 'admit' that? Like I said, if it accomplished anything, I'd support it. But it won't. Announcing such stuff is also putting the cart before the horse. You first take power and then do such things, not announce such things beforehand so you will not be able to take power.
Biology says women only want children with a stable provider (who doesn't have to be the father). If they can't find a sucker to pin the bill onto, they kill it.
Anybody who believes babies are aborted for being female in the West needs their head examined.
Anyone who listens to their unedited speech to each other without men present would agree without a doubt.
Anybody who believes babies are aborted for being female in the West needs their head examined.
Same for being male. But see, I can make unsubstantiated claims as well, except that mine are actually supported by more evidence. There are more male babies born than female ones. I think the more likely explanation is that you're more likely to get a boy than a girl though.
Anyone who listens to their unedited speech to each other without men present would agree without a doubt.
Yes, you are more likely, I believe it's a 51/49 chance.
Why do they matter? They go where the wind blows. They backed feminism before, now they're being revealed as hate-filled psychos, they're pretending they never did just to save social status.
Is an empirical question, which cannot be deduced from logic or biology.
Murica, not China or India.
How many people who weren't will 'admit' that? Like I said, if it accomplished anything, I'd support it. But it won't. Announcing such stuff is also putting the cart before the horse. You first take power and then do such things, not announce such things beforehand so you will not be able to take power.
Biology says women only want children with a stable provider (who doesn't have to be the father). If they can't find a sucker to pin the bill onto, they kill it.
Anybody who believes babies are aborted for being female in the West needs their head examined.
Anyone who listens to their unedited speech to each other without men present would agree without a doubt.
Same for being male. But see, I can make unsubstantiated claims as well, except that mine are actually supported by more evidence. There are more male babies born than female ones. I think the more likely explanation is that you're more likely to get a boy than a girl though.
Including wahmen who are not feminists?
Yes, you are more likely, I believe it's a 51/49 chance.
Why do they matter? They go where the wind blows. They backed feminism before, now they're being revealed as hate-filled psychos, they're pretending they never did just to save social status.
So now we use them as fodder.