Two of them simply tried to detain a moronic burglar who’d been robbing their neighbour hood and one was simply there and recorded the moron grabbing a shotgun and getting himself shot. Now they all get to spend the rest of their life in prison. The blacks are given free reign to commit every evil there is while whites are treated like subhumans by the nation they built. This nation is doomed and seems to deserve that doom.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (172)
sorted by:
No, I haven't. People can 'succeed' at life without becoming a manager of a hedgefund or an aeronautical engineer.
Success can be a simple as raising a well developed family, a stable financial situation, good health, and good morale. You can still be quite poor and have all of those things. You're calling that 'functional'. I'm saying many elites don't have that. You don't need high IQ for such a thing, it helps, but it's no guarantee.
You want a perfectly equal distribution between all IQ groups. That's not reality. They don't need to have perfectly equal distribution. Pay parity is not relevant beyond what they are competing at, and they are competing at low to medium level positions. That is competitive with their peers.
"White collar crime and fraud doesn't real"
Yeah? When they test IQ?
Bad news: they don't. Best they can do is the ASVAB. I can garuntee you that the military has been using people with IQ's under 80 for decades. "You get smart, or you get strong". Those guys got strong.
You're completely wrong, and the IQ results of the time utterly reject that. Ashkenazi jews had some of the lowest scores in America, in some cases, under blacks. That's what happens when immigrant populations come from specific categories of people that were not high in IQ, and then have a culture which emphasizes literacy, meritocracy, success, and strong family/social bonds. Especially if women are sex selecting for IQ.
Except it absolutely is. Women sex selecting for more intelligent men are the driver for a populations gain in intelligence. If you make an attribute a key qualifier for social success in a society, you will see women sex select for that attribute. If women need strong men to survive the dangers of predators, within very little time, you will find a population of men that are significantly stronger than previous generations. You said I ignored all the other corollaries to IQ. I didn't, I'm emphasizing them. If western societies confer social status and success to high IQ individuals, then that's exactly what's going to be selected for. Not to mention women explicitly sex select for higher intelligence anyway.
Women do not need you to show your test results, all those corollaries you're saying I ignored are how women are selecting: educational attainment, earning power, problem solving, emotional stoicism, long term time preference, etc. This is one of the things that will naturally cause a rise in IQ in populations over time, like with immigrant jews.
If a woman with an 75 IQ can select between a man of 70 IQ, 80 IQ, 90 IQ, and 120 IQ; she will likely choose 80 or 90. Meaning the 70 IQ man is left alone, and the 120 IQ man probably finds a woman with higher IQ elsewhere. Their offspring will probably be closer to 80 IQ. An 80 IQ woman can select between a man of 80 IQ, 90 IQ, 100 IQ, and 120 IQ. She will pick 90 or 100. Repeat this process forever. You will watch the general population's average IQ increase over generations.
You're hoping that the "Passing of The Great Race" genetic argument that the low IQ peoples will just wildly outbreed high IQ individuals and a net drain on IQ is inevitable. That is false. That sex selection happens at every single level. It doesn't NOT happen. Women marry up.
Again, this isn't true. Over the past century we've watched lots of groups in America, and Americans themselves have increasing IQ, and that IQ has had to be re-calibrated as the IQ has inflated. It also actually helps with the population is less young, because that is where the majority of the low IQ population lies.
No, that will amplify the exact problem we currently have by guaranteeing that no one is invested in their own development, and is the exact "coddling" that you are talking about. Socialism, lo and behold, is still not the answer.
That IQ correlates with social status doesn't mean that it's the only way, or even the best / most effective way, to achieve social status.
That women select for IQ doesn't mean that women only select for IQ.
Otherwise we'd all be geniouses by now.
Clearly there is an equilibrium. Populations stay around the same IQ level, and while we saw gains accross all gorups throughout the last century those gains were mainly due to nutrition and education. These gains were significant over time but anyway they have slowed down now or and are even reversing.
What you can't account for is that blacks have a 85 IQ as a maximum anywhere in the world if you correct for poverty. Places with no AA. Places where they are disenfranchised. Places where they are the dominating group. Places with strong welfare states. From the US, to Japan, to Denmark, to Italy, to I'm sure Morocco, etc.
If what you are saying was true, we'd see large variations in IQ's in populations based on their culture, not ethnicity.
But we are observing the exact opposite of that. Regardless of culture, ethnicity determines IQ. Chinese people in Norway, in the US, in China, in Africa, if we correct for socioeconomic status have similar average IQs.
In most African countrues the average is much lower than 85. Most are in the 60s, with at least a couple of countries in the 40s. However, it's likely that low because of cultural and economic reasons, bc when they emigrate they stabilize around 85 in the west where the conditions are best.
What it looks like is that there is a upper potential for IQ in various ethnicities, and that the group stabilizes around that IQ when they have access to ample nutrition and education.
For blacks, that's about one standard deviation below Europeans. Koreans are about half a standard deviation above Europeans. Regardless of any Flynn effect, these ratios are staying the same.